share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Vector Group Ltd.'s (NYSE:VGR) Recent US$68m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Vector Group Ltd.'s (NYSE:VGR) Recent US$68m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

机构所有者可以考虑像Vector集团有限公司那样采取严厉措施。”s(纽约证券交易所代码:VGR)最近的6800万美元下跌增加了长期损失
Simply Wall St ·  03/02 08:25

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Vector Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Vector Group的股价可能会受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有7名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 业内人士最近一直在抛售

A look at the shareholders of Vector Group Ltd. (NYSE:VGR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看矢量集团有限公司(纽约证券交易所代码:VGR)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。机构拥有65%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.8b last week after a 3.8% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 12% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Vector Group which might hurt individual investors.

因此,上周该公司的市值在股价下跌3.8%后跌至18亿美元,因此机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。最近的亏损加上股东一年的亏损12%,可能不适合这群投资者。也被称为 “智能货币”,机构对股票价格的走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果继续下跌,机构投资者可能会被迫出售Vector Group,这可能会伤害个人投资者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Vector Group.

在下图中,我们放大了 Vector Group 的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:VGR Ownership Breakdown March 2nd 2024
纽约证券交易所:VGR 所有权明细 2024 年 3 月 2 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vector Group?

关于Vector Group,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Vector Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vector Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所见,机构投资者在Vector Group中拥有相当数量的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Vector Group的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:VGR Earnings and Revenue Growth March 2nd 2024
纽约证券交易所:VGR 收益和收入增长 2024 年 3 月 2 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Vector Group is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 9.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Phillip Frost are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Howard Lorber is the owner of 3.5% of the company's shares.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。矢量集团不归对冲基金所有。贝莱德公司目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的14%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和Phillip Frost分别拥有11%和9.4%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。此外,首席执行官霍华德·洛伯是该公司3.5%股份的所有者。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前7名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有一些分析师对这只股票的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Vector Group

矢量集团的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Vector Group Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.8b, and insiders have US$252m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有Vector集团有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为18亿美元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值2.52亿美元的股票。这非常重要。大多数人会说,这表明了与股东的良好一致性,尤其是在如此规模的公司中。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Vector Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有矢量集团21%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Vector Group (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored) .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们在 Vector Group 中发现的 4 个警告信号(包括 2 个不容忽视的警告)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发