share_log

Lancy (SZSE:002612) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Lancy (SZSE:002612) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Lancy (SZSE: 002612) 的资产负债表相当不错
Simply Wall St ·  02/27 18:09

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Lancy Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002612) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

大卫·伊本说得好,他说:“波动性不是我们关心的风险。我们关心的是避免资本的永久损失。”当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢考虑其债务的用途,因为债务过载可能导致破产。重要的是,朗西有限公司(深圳证券交易所:002612)确实有债务。但真正的问题是这笔债务是否使公司面临风险。

When Is Debt A Problem?

债务何时会成为问题?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

债务为企业提供帮助,直到企业难以用新的资本或自由现金流还清债务。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能一无所有地离开。尽管这种情况不太常见,但我们经常看到负债公司永久稀释股东,因为贷款人迫使他们以低价筹集资金。话虽如此,最常见的情况是公司合理地管理债务,而且对自己有利。考虑公司债务水平的第一步是将其现金和债务放在一起考虑。

What Is Lancy's Debt?

什么是兰西的债务?

As you can see below, Lancy had CN¥931.4m of debt at September 2023, down from CN¥1.21b a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of CN¥423.6m, its net debt is less, at about CN¥507.7m.

如下所示,截至2023年9月,兰西的债务为9.314亿元人民币,低于去年同期的12.1亿元人民币。但是,由于其现金储备为4.236亿元人民币,其净负债较少,约为5.077亿元人民币。

debt-equity-history-analysis
SZSE:002612 Debt to Equity History February 27th 2024
SZSE: 002612 2024 年 2 月 27 日债务与股本比率的历史记录

A Look At Lancy's Liabilities

看看兰西的负债

The latest balance sheet data shows that Lancy had liabilities of CN¥2.62b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥1.13b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had CN¥423.6m in cash and CN¥365.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥2.97b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,兰西的负债为26.2亿元人民币,此后到期的负债为11.3亿元人民币。与此相抵消的是,它有4.236亿元的现金和3.657亿元人民币的应收账款将在12个月内到期。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总额高出29.7亿元人民币。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Lancy has a market capitalization of CN¥7.90b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

尽管这可能看起来很多,但还不错,因为朗西的市值为790亿元人民币,因此如果需要,它可能会通过筹集资金来加强资产负债表。但很明显,我们一定要仔细研究它能否在不稀释的情况下管理债务。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

为了扩大公司相对于收益的负债规模,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),将其利息和税前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。这种方法的优势在于,我们既考虑了债务的绝对数量(包括净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润),也考虑了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(及其利息覆盖率)。

We'd say that Lancy's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.8), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its commanding EBIT of 24.0 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. Notably, Lancy's EBIT launched higher than Elon Musk, gaining a whopping 145% on last year. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Lancy's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

我们可以说,兰西的净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润的比率适中(为1.8),这表明在债务问题上谨慎行事。其惊人的息税前利润是其利息支出的24.0倍,这意味着债务负担像孔雀羽毛一样轻。值得注意的是,兰西的息税前利润高于埃隆·马斯克,比去年增长了145%。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但是,未来的收益比什么都重要,将决定兰西未来维持健康资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, Lancy actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

但是我们最终的考虑因素也很重要,因为公司无法用纸面利润来偿还债务;它需要冷硬现金。因此,合乎逻辑的步骤是研究息税前利润与实际自由现金流相匹配的比例。在过去的三年中,兰西产生的自由现金流实际上超过了息税前利润。在保持贷款人的支持方面,没有什么比流入的现金更好的了。

Our View

我们的观点

Lancy's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is also very heartening. Zooming out, Lancy seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Lancy, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

兰西的利息保障表明,它可以像克里斯蒂亚诺·罗纳尔多在对阵14岁以下的守门员的比赛中进球一样轻松地处理债务。这仅仅是好消息的开始,因为将息税前利润转换为自由现金流也非常令人鼓舞。放眼望去,兰西似乎相当合理地使用债务;这得到了我们的点头。虽然债务确实会带来风险,但如果明智地使用,它也可以带来更高的股本回报率。随着时间的推移,股价往往会跟随每股收益,因此,如果你对兰西感兴趣,你很可能想点击这里查看其每股收益历史的互动图表。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

毕竟,如果你对一家资产负债表坚如磐石的快速成长型公司更感兴趣,那么请立即查看我们的净现金增长股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发