share_log

Raffles Medical Group Ltd's (SGX:BSL) Market Cap Surged S$74m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

Raffles Medical Group Ltd's (SGX:BSL) Market Cap Surged S$74m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

莱佛士医疗集团有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:BSL)的市值上周飙升了7400万新元,对公司有很大依赖的私营公司获得了奖励
Simply Wall St ·  02/20 17:36

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Raffles Medical Group by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 3 shareholders own 59% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Raffles Medical Group is 13%
  • 私营公司对莱佛士医疗集团的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 前三名股东拥有公司59%的股份
  • 莱佛士医疗集团的内部所有权为13%

Every investor in Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

莱佛士医疗集团有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:BSL)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为42%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 4.0% gain.

结果,私营公司是上周4.0%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Raffles Medical Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于莱佛士医疗集团的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:BSL Ownership Breakdown February 20th 2024
新加坡证券交易所:BSL 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 20 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raffles Medical Group?

关于莱佛士医疗集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Raffles Medical Group. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Raffles Medical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者持有莱佛士医疗集团的大量股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下莱佛士医疗集团过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:BSL Earnings and Revenue Growth February 20th 2024
新加坡证券交易所:BSL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 20 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Raffles Medical Group. Raffles Medical Holdings Pte. Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 39% of shares outstanding. Choon Yong Loo is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Global Alpha Capital Management Ltd. holds about 9.1% of the company stock. Choon Yong Loo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

对冲基金在莱佛士医疗集团的股份不多。莱佛士医疗控股有限公司Ltd. 目前是最大股东,已发行股份的39%。Choon Yong Loo是第二大股东,拥有11%的普通股,环球阿尔法资本管理有限公司持有该公司约9.1%的股份。第二大股东Choon Yong Loo也恰好拥有首席执行官的头衔。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 59% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细的研究表明,3位大股东通过其59%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Raffles Medical Group

莱佛士医疗集团的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Raffles Medical Group Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just S$1.9b, and insiders have S$249m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

内部人士似乎拥有莱佛士医疗集团有限公司的很大一部分股份。该公司的市值仅为19亿新元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值2.49亿新元的股票。这非常重要。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 29% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Raffles Medical Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有29%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对莱佛士医疗集团有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 42%, of the Raffles Medical Group stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎拥有莱佛士医疗集团42%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Raffles Medical Group (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。为此,你应该了解我们在莱佛士医疗集团发现的两个警告信号(包括一个有点令人担忧的警告)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发