share_log

Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603906) 17% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 46% as Well as Insiders

Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603906) 17% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 46% as Well as Insiders

江苏龙宝科技有限公司。's (SHSE: 603906) 上周涨幅17%,使持有46%的个人投资者和内部人士受益
Simply Wall St ·  02/12 21:02

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Jiangsu Lopal Tech indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 42% of Jiangsu Lopal Tech is held by insiders
  • 个人投资者在江苏龙宝科技拥有大量所有权,这表明他们在管理和业务战略方面集体拥有更大的发言权
  • 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 江苏龙宝科技42%的股份由内部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603906) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看江苏龙宝科技的股东。有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:603906)可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为46%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 17% price gain, insiders also received a 42% cut.

尽管在上周股价上涨17%之后,个人投资者是获得最大收益的群体,但内部人士也获得了42%的下调。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Jiangsu Lopal Tech, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究江苏龙宝科技的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603906 Ownership Breakdown February 13th 2024
SHSE: 603906 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jiangsu Lopal Tech?

关于江苏龙宝科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

Jiangsu Lopal Tech already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jiangsu Lopal Tech, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

江苏龙宝科技已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看江苏龙宝科技过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603906 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 13th 2024
SHSE: 603906 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 13 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jiangsu Lopal Tech. The company's largest shareholder is Jun Feng Shi, with ownership of 38%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.2% and 1.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对江苏龙宝科技进行有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是石俊峰,所有权为38%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的4.2%和1.6%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前十名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Jiangsu Lopal Tech

江苏龙宝科技的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Jiangsu Lopal Tech. Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.1b stake in this CN¥4.9b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人士拥有江苏龙宝科技合理比例的股份。有限公司。。业内人士在这项49亿元的业务中持有21亿元人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Jiangsu Lopal Tech. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有江苏龙宝科技46%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Jiangsu Lopal Tech that you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定了江苏龙宝科技的1个警告标志,你应该注意这一点。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,来看看这份有趣的公司的免费清单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发