share_log

With 7.1% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Universal Corporation's (NYSE:UVV) 10% Stock Price Decline

With 7.1% One-year Returns, Institutional Owners May Ignore Universal Corporation's (NYSE:UVV) 10% Stock Price Decline

凭借7.1%的一年期回报率,机构所有者可能会忽略环球公司(纽约证券交易所代码:UVV)10%的股价下跌
Simply Wall St ·  02/09 08:52

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Universal implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构在环球影业的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 前6名股东拥有公司51%的股份
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

If you want to know who really controls Universal Corporation (NYSE:UVV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了环球公司(纽约证券交易所代码:UVV),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$152m last week. However, the 7.1% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周该公司的市值下降了1.52亿美元后,机构投资者遭受了最大的损失。但是,7.1%的一年期回报率可能有助于减轻他们的总体损失。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Universal, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究环球影业的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:UVV Ownership Breakdown February 9th 2024
纽约证券交易所:UVV 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Universal?

关于环球影业,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Universal. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Universal, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者在环球影业拥有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看环球影业过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:UVV Earnings and Revenue Growth February 9th 2024
纽约证券交易所:UVV收益和收入增长 2024年2月9日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Universal. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 16%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 7.7% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO George Freeman is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。对冲基金在环球影业的股票不多。该公司的最大股东是贝莱德公司,所有权为16%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股东,拥有12%的普通股,Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有该公司约7.7%的股份。此外,首席执行官乔治·弗里曼持有该公司0.7%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前六名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Universal

环球影业的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Universal Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$24m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股东们可能会有兴趣得知内部人士拥有环球公司的股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值2400万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。很高兴看到内部人士的这种投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司15%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Universal you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了你应该注意的3个环球警告信号,其中一个可能很严重。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发