share_log

Cinda Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600657) Latest 14% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Cinda Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600657) Latest 14% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

信达地产有限公司s(SHSE: 600657)最近14%的跌幅增加了一年的亏损,机构投资者可能会考虑采取严厉措施
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 17:50

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Cinda Real Estate implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The largest shareholder of the company is CINDA INVESTMENT Co.,LTD with a 54% stake
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构持有信达地产的大量股权意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响
  • 该公司的最大股东是信达投资有限公司。, LTD 持有 54% 的股份
  • 使用公司过去业绩的数据以及所有权研究,可以更好地评估公司的未来表现

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cinda Real Estate Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600657), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制了信达地产有限公司(SHSE: 600657),了解该业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有58%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.5b. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 42% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Cinda Real Estate's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

结果,在市值下跌15亿元人民币之后,机构投资者上周遭受了最大的损失。这组投资者可能特别担心当前的亏损,这加剧了股东一年的亏损42%。机构或 “流动性提供者” 控制着大量资金,因此,这些类型的投资者通常对股价走势有很大的影响力。因此,如果信达地产股价持续疲软,机构投资者可能会感到不得不出售该股票,这对于个人投资者来说可能并不理想。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cinda Real Estate.

在下图中,我们放大了信达房地产的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600657 Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
SHSE: 600657 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cinda Real Estate?

关于信达地产,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

We can see that Cinda Real Estate does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cinda Real Estate, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,信达房地产确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看信达房地产过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600657 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
SHSE: 600657 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 6 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cinda Real Estate. The company's largest shareholder is CINDA INVESTMENT Co.,LTD, with ownership of 54%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Huaihe Energy Holding Group Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Jiangxi Ganyue Expressway CO.,LTD. holds about 3.2% of the company stock.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。对冲基金在信达房地产的股份不多。该公司的最大股东是信达投资有限公司。,LTD,所有权为54%。由于所有权持有如此巨额的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。淮河能源控股集团有限公司是第二大股东,拥有19%的普通股,江西赣悦高速公路有限公司。, LTD. 持有公司约3.2%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Cinda Real Estate

信达房地产的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们的数据无法证实董事会成员亲自持有股份。董事会成员不持有至少部分个人持股的情况很少见,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。一个不错的下一步是检查首席执行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cinda Real Estate. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

信达房地产拥有20%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对信达房地产有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 19%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的19%。私人公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而不是以个人身份对上市公司感兴趣。虽然很难得出任何广泛的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 3.2% of the Cinda Real Estate shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我们可以看到,上市公司持有信达房地产发行股票的3.2%。这可能是战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。可能是他们已经消失了。这一裁定可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Cinda Real Estate (of which 2 are significant!) you should know about.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。比如风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现了信达房地产的3个警告信号(其中2个很重要!)你应该知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发