share_log

Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 23% Reduction in Holdings Value

Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) CEO Marc Fogassa, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 23% Reduction in Holdings Value

阿特拉斯锂业公司(纳斯达克股票代码:ATLX)首席执行官马克·福加萨是该公司的最大股东,其持股价值下降了23%
Simply Wall St ·  02/06 07:14

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Atlas Lithium implies vested interests in company growth
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 对Atlas Lithium的重大内部控制意味着公司增长中的既得利益
  • 51% 的业务由前三名股东持有
  • 所有权研究与过去的表现数据相结合,可以帮助人们更好地了解股票的机会

Every investor in Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:ATLX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 51% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

阿特拉斯锂业公司(纳斯达克股票代码:ATLX)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。个人内部人士持有51%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$61m.

结果,在市值下降6100万美元之后,内部人士作为一个整体遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Atlas Lithium.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于阿特拉斯锂业的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:ATLX Ownership Breakdown February 6th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:ATLX 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Atlas Lithium?

关于阿特拉斯锂业,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Atlas Lithium. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Atlas Lithium, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者持有阿特拉斯锂业的相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Atlas Lithium过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:ATLX Earnings and Revenue Growth February 6th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:ATLX 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 6 日

It would appear that 5.9% of Atlas Lithium shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. With a 39% stake, CEO Marc Fogassa is the largest shareholder. With 6.1% and 5.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Antonis Palikrousis and Waratah Capital Advisors Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

看来阿特拉斯锂业有5.9%的股票由对冲基金控制。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和活跃。许多人正在寻找推动股价上涨的中期催化剂。首席执行官马克·福加萨持有39%的股份,是最大股东。安东尼斯·帕利克鲁西斯和Waratah Capital Advisors Ltd.分别占已发行股份的6.1%和5.9%,是第二和第三大股东。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘之后,我们发现前三名股东共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有影响公司决策的巨大权力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Atlas Lithium

阿特拉斯锂业的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Atlas Lithium Corporation. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own US$102m worth of shares in the US$201m company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士拥有阿特拉斯锂业公司一半以上的股份。这使他们能够有效控制公司。这意味着他们拥有这家价值2.01亿美元的公司价值1.02亿美元的股份。这很有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Atlas Lithium. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有35%所有权的公众(主要由个人投资者组成)对Atlas Lithium有一定程度的影响力。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Atlas Lithium you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit concerning.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的4个Atlas Lithium警告信号,其中2个有点令人担忧。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发