share_log

Private Companies Are Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603931) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥431m

Private Companies Are Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603931) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥431m

私营公司是杭州格林达电子材料有限公司s (SHSE: 603931) 最大的所有者在市值下降4.31亿元人民币后受到打击
Simply Wall St ·  02/04 20:11

Key Insights

关键见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 63% ownership
  • Institutions own 11% of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials
  • 杭州格林达电子材料的私营公司拥有大量所有权,这表明他们在管理和业务战略方面拥有更大的发言权
  • 共有2名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为63%
  • 机构拥有杭州格林达电子材料11%的股份

Every investor in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603931) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

杭州格林达电子材料有限公司(SHSE: 603931)的每位投资者都应了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,私营公司拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为51%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As market cap fell to CN¥3.8b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着上周市值跌至38亿元人民币,私营公司面临的损失将超过该公司任何其他股东群体。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究杭州格林达电子材料的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603931 Ownership Breakdown February 5th 2024
SHSE: 603931 所有权明细 2024 年 2 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials?

关于杭州格林达电子材料,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所见,机构投资者持有杭州格林达电子材料的大量股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到杭州格林达电子材料的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603931 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 5th 2024
SHSE: 603931 收益和收入增长 2024 年 2 月 5 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. Hangzhou Electrochemical Group Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 42% of shares outstanding. With 21% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ningbo Qingcheng Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (LP) and Hangzhou Lusheng Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对杭州格林达电子材料进行有意义的投资。杭州电化集团有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的42%。宁波青城投资管理合伙企业(LP)和杭州绿盛投资合伙企业(有限合伙)分别占已发行股份的21%和5.4%,是第二和第三大股东。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials

杭州格林达电子材料的内幕所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人员的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥3.8b, and the board has only CN¥14m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有的杭州格林达电子材料有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我们确实注意到,内部人士有可能通过私营公司或其他公司结构获得间接利益。它的市值仅为38亿元人民币,董事会以自己的名义持有价值1400万元人民币的股票。许多人倾向于看到一个拥有更多股权的董事会。一个不错的下一步可能是看看这份免费的内幕买入和卖出摘要。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

杭州格林达电子材料拥有17%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众,在一定程度上对杭州格林达电子材料有影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 21%, private equity firms could influence the Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有21%的股份,可能会影响杭州格林达电子材料董事会。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 51%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司51%的股份。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,对其中一家私营公司感兴趣,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能对公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hangzhou Greenda Electronic Materials you should be aware of.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了一个你应该注意的杭州格林达电子材料的警告标志。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,来看看这份有趣的公司的免费清单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发