share_log

The Five-year Underlying Earnings Growth at First Bancshares (NASDAQ:FBMS) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time

The Five-year Underlying Earnings Growth at First Bancshares (NASDAQ:FBMS) Is Promising, but the Shareholders Are Still in the Red Over That Time

First Bancshares(纳斯达克股票代码:FBMS)的五年基础收益增长令人鼓舞,但在此期间,股东仍处于亏损状态
Simply Wall St ·  02/01 07:32

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But in any portfolio, there will be mixed results between individual stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in The First Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBMS), since the last five years saw the share price fall 22%. Unfortunately the share price momentum is still quite negative, with prices down 13% in thirty days. Importantly, this could be a market reaction to the recently released financial results. You can check out the latest numbers in our company report.

对于许多人来说,投资的要点是产生比整个市场更高的回报。但是在任何投资组合中,个股之间的结果都会好坏参半。目前,一些股东可能会质疑他们对第一银行股份公司(纳斯达克股票代码:FBMS)的投资,因为在过去五年中,股价下跌了22%。不幸的是,股价势头仍然相当不利,股价在三十天内下跌了13%。重要的是,这可能是市场对最近公布的财务业绩的反应。你可以在我们的公司报告中查看最新的数字。

After losing 9.6% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.

在上周下跌9.6%之后,值得研究该公司的基本面,看看我们可以从过去的表现中推断出什么。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者 沃伦·巴菲特描述了股价如何并不总是合理地反映企业的价值。考虑市场对公司的看法发生了怎样的变化的一种不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价走势进行比较。

While the share price declined over five years, First Bancshares actually managed to increase EPS by an average of 8.0% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.

尽管股价在五年内下跌,但First Bancshares实际上设法下跌了 增加 每股收益平均每年增长8.0%。因此,每股收益似乎不是了解市场如何估值股票的好指南。或者,市场此前可能非常乐观,因此尽管每股收益有所改善,但该股还是令人失望。

It's strange to see such muted share price performance despite sustained growth. Perhaps a clue lies in other metrics.

尽管持续增长,但看到股价表现如此低迷真是太奇怪了。也许线索在于其他指标。

In contrast to the share price, revenue has actually increased by 17% a year in the five year period. So it seems one might have to take closer look at the fundamentals to understand why the share price languishes. After all, there may be an opportunity.

与股价形成鲜明对比的是,在五年期间,收入实际上每年增长17%。因此,看来人们可能必须仔细研究基本面才能理解股价下跌的原因。毕竟,可能有机会。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下图描述了收入和收入随时间推移而发生的变化(点击图片即可显示确切的数值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:FBMS Earnings and Revenue Growth February 1st 2024
纳斯达克通用汽车公司:FBMS收益和收入增长 2024年2月1日

Take a more thorough look at First Bancshares' financial health with this free report on its balance sheet.

通过这份免费的资产负债表报告,更全面地了解First Bancshares的财务状况。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, First Bancshares' TSR for the last 5 years was -14%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

除了衡量股价回报率外,投资者还应考虑股东总回报率(TSR)。基于股息再投资的假设,股东总回报率纳入了任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值以及任何股息。可以说,股东总回报率更全面地描述了股票产生的回报。碰巧的是,First Bancshares在过去5年的股东总回报率为-14%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。而且,猜测股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧是没有好处的!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

Investors in First Bancshares had a tough year, with a total loss of 15% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 17%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 3% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for First Bancshares you should know about.

First Bancshares的投资者经历了艰难的一年,总亏损了15%(包括股息),而市场涨幅约为17%。即使是优质股票的股价有时也会下跌,但我们希望在过于感兴趣之前看到企业基本指标的改善。不幸的是,去年的表现可能预示着尚未解决的挑战,因为它比过去五年中3%的年化亏损还要糟糕。总的来说,长期股价疲软可能是一个坏兆头,尽管逆势投资者可能希望研究该股以期出现转机。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了你应该知道的First Bancshares的1个警告信号。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

如果你想与管理层一起购买股票,那么你可能会喜欢这份免费的公司名单。(提示:业内人士一直在购买它们)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发