share_log

After the Recent Decline, Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd (SHSE:603688) CEO Shibin Chen's Holdings Have Lost 9.1% of Their Value

Simply Wall St ·  Jan 24 22:45

Key Insights

  • Significant insider control over Jiangsu Pacific Quartz implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • 16% of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz is held by Institutions

If you want to know who really controls Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd (SHSE:603688), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 31% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 9.1%.

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz.

See our latest analysis for Jiangsu Pacific Quartz

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603688 Ownership Breakdown January 25th 2024

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jiangsu Pacific Quartz?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Jiangsu Pacific Quartz does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jiangsu Pacific Quartz's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603688 Earnings and Revenue Growth January 25th 2024

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jiangsu Pacific Quartz. With a 27% stake, CEO Shibin Chen is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 23% and 3.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Jing Shao is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Jiangsu Pacific Quartz

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Jiangsu Pacific Quartz Co., Ltd. Insiders own CN¥8.9b worth of shares in the CN¥28b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Jiangsu Pacific Quartz. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 23%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Jiangsu Pacific Quartz better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Jiangsu Pacific Quartz (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of any specific investment or investment strategy. Read more
    Write a comment