share_log

Despite Recent Sales, Super Strong Holdings Limited (HKG:8262) Insiders Still Control 54% of the Company

Despite Recent Sales, Super Strong Holdings Limited (HKG:8262) Insiders Still Control 54% of the Company

尽管最近有销售,但超强控股有限公司(HKG: 8262)内部人士仍控制着该公司54%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  2023/12/12 17:51

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Super Strong Holdings implies vested interests in company growth
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 对Super Strong Holdings的重大内部控制意味着公司增长具有既得利益
  • 54% 的业务由前四名股东持有
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

Every investor in Super Strong Holdings Limited (HKG:8262) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

超强控股有限公司(HKG: 8262)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。个人内部人士持有54%的股份,拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

Insiders own the top position in the company's share registry despite recent sales and as a result, were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 58% gain.

尽管最近进行了销售,但业内人士在公司股票登记处仍位居榜首,因此,他们是上周58%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Super Strong Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下表开始,更深入地研究Super Strong Holdings的每种所有者。

View our latest analysis for Super Strong Holdings

查看我们对超强控股的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:8262 Ownership Breakdown December 12th 2023
香港交易所:8262 所有权明细 2023 年 12 月 12 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Super Strong Holdings?

关于超强控股,机构所有权的缺乏告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构投资者通常会避开规模太小、流动性太差或风险太大的公司,不符合他们的口味。但是,看到没有任何机构投资者的大型公司是不寻常的。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Super Strong Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

没有机构拥有公司股份的原因可能多种多样。通常,小型新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在公司中建立有意义的地位。或者,该公司的某些方面可能使机构投资者望而却步。Super Strong Holdings的收益和收入记录(下图)可能不会吸引机构投资者,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究过该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:8262 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 12th 2023
香港交易所:8262 2023年12月12日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Super Strong Holdings. Our data suggests that Tung Keung Kwok, who is also the company's Chief Compliance Officer, holds the most number of shares at 31%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. The second and third largest shareholders are Shanmin Ye and Long Liu, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.5%.

对冲基金在Super Strong Holdings的股票不多。我们的数据表明,同时也是公司首席合规官的郭东强持股最多,为31%。当内部人士持有公司大量股票时,投资者会将其视为一个积极的信号,因为这表明内部人士愿意将自己的财富绑定到公司的未来。第二和第三大股东是叶善民和刘龙,他们名下的股份数量相等,为7.5%。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即公司约有54%的股份由前四名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。我们的信息表明,分析师对该股没有任何报道,因此可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Super Strong Holdings

超强控股的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Super Strong Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$1.1b, that means they have HK$584m worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有超强控股有限公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。鉴于其市值为11亿港元,这意味着他们拥有价值5.84亿港元的股票。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 46% stake in Super Strong Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Super Strong Holdings46%的股份。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Super Strong Holdings (at least 2 which are potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管值得考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。我们已经发现Super Strong Holdings的3个警告信号(至少有2个可能很严重),了解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意去另一家公司看看,一家财务状况可能更好,那么千万不要错过这份由强劲财务数据支持的有趣公司的免费名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发