share_log

Is Lancy (SZSE:002612) A Risky Investment?

Is Lancy (SZSE:002612) A Risky Investment?

兰西(SZSE: 002612)是一项风险投资吗?
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/27 19:43

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Lancy Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002612) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

大卫·伊本说得很好,他说:“波动性不是我们关心的风险。我们关心的是避免资本的永久损失。”当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢看它对债务的使用,因为债务超负荷可能导致破产。我们可以看到,朗西有限公司(SZSE:002612)确实在其业务中使用了债务。但真正的问题是,这笔债务是否使公司面临风险。

When Is Debt A Problem?

债务何时会成为问题?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业发展的工具,但是如果企业无法还清贷款人,那么债务就任其摆布。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以控制业务。但是,更常见(但仍然令人痛苦)的情况是,它必须以低廉的价格筹集新的股本资本,从而永久稀释股东。话虽如此,最常见的情况是公司合理地管理其债务,而且对自己有利。当我们考虑公司对债务的使用时,我们首先要同时考虑现金和债务。

See our latest analysis for Lancy

查看我们对 Lancy 的最新分析

What Is Lancy's Net Debt?

兰西的净负债是多少?

As you can see below, Lancy had CN¥931.4m of debt at September 2023, down from CN¥1.21b a year prior. On the flip side, it has CN¥423.6m in cash leading to net debt of about CN¥507.7m.

如下所示,截至2023年9月,兰西的债务为9.314亿元人民币,低于去年同期的12.1亿元人民币。另一方面,它拥有4.236亿元人民币的现金,净负债约为5.077亿元人民币。

debt-equity-history-analysis
SZSE:002612 Debt to Equity History November 28th 2023
深圳证券交易所:002612 债权与股权历史记录 2023 年 11 月 28 日

How Healthy Is Lancy's Balance Sheet?

兰西的资产负债表有多健康?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Lancy had liabilities of CN¥2.62b due within 12 months and liabilities of CN¥1.13b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥423.6m and CN¥365.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥2.97b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

纵观最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到,兰西在12个月内到期的负债为26.2亿元人民币,此后到期的负债为11.3亿元人民币。另一方面,它在一年内有4.236亿元人民币的现金和价值3.657亿元人民币的应收账款。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和高出29.7亿元人民币。

Lancy has a market capitalization of CN¥9.00b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

兰西的市值为900亿元人民币,因此,如果有需要,它很可能会筹集资金来改善资产负债表。但是,仍然值得仔细研究其偿还债务的能力。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我们使用两个主要比率来告知我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),第二个是其利息和税前收益(EBIT)覆盖其利息支出(或简称利息保障)的多少倍。因此,我们将债务与收益的关系考虑在内,包括和不包括折旧和摊销费用。

We'd say that Lancy's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.6), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its strong interest cover of 1k times, makes us even more comfortable. Better yet, Lancy grew its EBIT by 210% last year, which is an impressive improvement. That boost will make it even easier to pay down debt going forward. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Lancy can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

我们可以说,兰西的净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润的比率适中(为1.6),表明在债务方面谨慎行事。而且其1k倍的强劲利息保障使我们更加舒服。更好的是,兰西去年的息税前利润增长了210%,这是一个令人印象深刻的进步。这种提振将使未来偿还债务变得更加容易。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是起点。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定兰西能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Lancy actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法削减债务。因此,我们显然需要研究息税前利润是否带来了相应的自由现金流。在过去的三年中,兰西产生的自由现金流实际上超过了息税前利润。在 Daft Punk 音乐会上,这种强劲的现金转换让我们和观众一样兴奋。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Lancy's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Lancy's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. Above most other metrics, we think its important to track how fast earnings per share is growing, if at all. If you've also come to that realization, you're in luck, because today you can view this interactive graph of Lancy's earnings per share history for free.

令人高兴的是,兰西令人印象深刻的利息保障意味着它在债务上占了上风。好消息还不止于此,因为它将息税前利润转换为自由现金流也支持了这种印象!从大局来看,我们认为兰西使用债务似乎相当合理,我们对此并不担心。虽然债务确实带来风险,但如果使用得当,它也可以带来更高的股本回报率。在大多数其他指标之上,我们认为重要的是要追踪每股收益的增长速度(如果有的话)。如果你也意识到了这一点,那你很幸运,因为今天你可以免费查看这张显示兰西每股收益历史的交互式图表。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

归根结底,通常最好将注意力集中在没有净负债的公司身上。您可以访问我们的此类公司的特别名单(所有公司都有利润增长记录)。它是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发