share_log

Chengjun Li Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 15%last Week

Chengjun Li Sprocomm Intelligence Limited's (HKG:1401) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 15%last Week

李成军 Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG: 1401) 首席执行官是最看涨的内部人士,他们的股票价值上周上涨了15%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/11/23 17:13

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Sprocomm Intelligence's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 2 shareholders own 67% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 业内人士似乎对Sprocomm Intelligence的增长有既得利益,从他们庞大的所有权可以看出
  • 前两名股东拥有公司67%的股份
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

If you want to know who really controls Sprocomm Intelligence Limited (HKG:1401), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Sprocomm Intelligence Limited(HKG: 1401),那么你必须看看其股票注册表的构成。我们可以看到,个人内部人士拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为67%。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 15% gain.

结果,内部人士是上周15%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sprocomm Intelligence, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下表开始,更深入地研究Sprocomm Intelligence的每种所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Sprocomm Intelligence

查看我们对 Sprocomm Intelligence 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1401 Ownership Breakdown November 23rd 2023
香港交易所:1401 所有权明细 2023 年 11 月 23 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sprocomm Intelligence?

关于Sprocomm Intelligence,缺乏机构所有权能告诉我们什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们往往不会看到机构投资者持有风险很大、交易量稀少或规模很小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时会看到大公司没有注册机构,但这种情况并不特别常见。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Sprocomm Intelligence, for yourself, below.

没有机构拥有公司股份的原因可能多种多样。通常,小型新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在公司中建立有意义的地位。基金经理也有可能不拥有这只股票,因为他们不相信股票会表现良好。机构投资者可能不会觉得该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能还有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面亲眼看到Sprocomm Intelligence过去的收入表现。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1401 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 23rd 2023
香港交易所:1401 2023年11月23日收益和收入增长

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Sprocomm Intelligence. The company's CEO Chengjun Li is the largest shareholder with 37% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 31% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Bin Xiong is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

对冲基金在Sprocomm Intelligence的股票不多。该公司首席执行官李成军是最大股东,持有37%的已发行股份。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约31%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有7.5%的所有权。有趣的是,熊斌是第二大股东,同时也是高级首席执行官,他再次指出,该公司的主要股东拥有强大的内幕所有权。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,足以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Sprocomm Intelligence

Sprocomm 情报的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Sprocomm Intelligence Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a HK$2.3b stake in this HK$3.4b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Sprocomm Intelligence Limited的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。因此,他们在这项34亿港元的业务中拥有23亿港元的股份。大多数人会认为这是积极的,表明了与股东的强烈一致。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sprocomm Intelligence. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众拥有25%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成,对Sprocomm Intelligence有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以使政策决策向他们倾斜,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 7.5%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股票的7.5%。可能值得对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,例如内部人士,在其中一家私营公司中拥有权益,则应在年度报告中披露。私营公司也可能在公司中拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Sprocomm Intelligence (including 3 which shouldn't be ignored) .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们在Sprocomm Intelligence上发现的4个警告信号(包括3个不容忽视的警告)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,来看看这份免费的有趣公司名单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发