share_log

TI Cloud Inc.'s (HKG:2167) Largest Shareholder, CEO Qiang Wu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 20% Following Recent Drop

TI Cloud Inc.'s (HKG:2167) Largest Shareholder, CEO Qiang Wu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 20% Following Recent Drop

TI Cloud Inc. 's (HKG: 2167) 最大股东、首席执行官吴强认为控股价值在近期下跌后将下跌20%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/07/14 18:09

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in TI Cloud's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 内部人士似乎在TI Cloud的增长中拥有既得利益,这一点从他们的大规模所有权可以看出
  • 共有3名投资者持有该公司52%的多数股权
  • 所有权研究,结合过去的业绩数据,可以帮助您更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls TI Cloud Inc. (HKG:2167), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了TI Cloud Inc.(HKG:2167),那么你必须看看它的股票注册表的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团,准确地说约为50%左右,是个人内部人士。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

As market cap fell to HK$1.7b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着上周市值跌至17亿港元,内部人士将面临比该公司其他任何股东群体都要高的损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of TI Cloud, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下面的图表开始,更深入地研究TI Cloud的每种类型的所有者。

View our latest analysis for TI Cloud

查看我们对TI Cloud的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2167 Ownership Breakdown July 14th 2023
联交所:2167拥有权分类2023年7月14日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TI Cloud?

缺乏机构所有权告诉了我们关于TI Cloud的什么信息?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构投资者往往会避开那些规模太小、流动性太差或风险太高的公司,这些公司对他们的口味来说太小了。但在没有任何机构投资者的情况下,看到较大的公司并不常见。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. TI Cloud's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

对于机构为何不持有股票,有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理下的资金,该公司规模太小,因此该机构不会费心密切关注该公司。基金经理也有可能不持有这只股票,因为他们不相信它会表现良好。德州仪器云的盈利和营收记录(见下文)对机构投资者来说可能并不具有说服力--或者他们可能只是没有密切关注这项业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2167 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 14th 2023
联交所:2167盈利及收入增长2023年7月14日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 5.3% of TI Cloud. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Qiang Wu with 34% of shares outstanding. Fortune Ascend Holdings Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Wei Pan holds about 7.8% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Wei Pan is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我们的数据显示,对冲基金拥有TI Cloud 5.3%的股份。这引起了我的注意,因为对冲基金有时会试图影响管理层,或者带来为股东创造短期价值的变化。看看我们的数据,我们可以看到,第一大股东是拥有34%流通股的CEO强武。富达控股有限公司是第二大股东,持有10%的普通股,潘玮柏持有公司约7.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股东潘伟也是董事会成员,这再次表明公司大股东中存在强烈的内部人所有权。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现,前3名股东合计控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有相当大的权力来影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。虽然有一些分析师的报道,但该公司可能没有得到广泛的报道。因此,它可以获得更多的关注,在赛道上。

Insider Ownership Of TI Cloud

TI Cloud的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in TI Cloud Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just HK$1.7b, and insiders have HK$822m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有TI Cloud Inc.的大量股份。该公司市值仅为17亿港元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值8.22亿港元的股票。这可能表明,创始人仍持有大量股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是在买入还是在卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TI Cloud. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有35%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对TI Cloud有一定程度的影响力。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 10%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们可以看到,私营公司拥有10%的已发行股份。或许有必要对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,如内部人士,对这些私营公司中的一家有利害关系,则应在年报中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with TI Cloud .

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。为此,您应该意识到1个警告标志我们发现了TI Cloud。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费分析师对该公司的预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发