share_log

Recent 4.8% Pullback Would Hurt Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651) Insiders

Recent 4.8% Pullback Would Hurt Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651) Insiders

近期 4.8% 的回调将损害成都利君实业股份有限公司(SZSE: 002651)内部人士
Simply Wall St ·  2023/04/14 19:37

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Chengdu Leejun Industrial's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 2 shareholders own 60% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 业内人士似乎对成都利君实业的增长有既得利益,他们的庞大所有权就证明了这一点
  • 前两名股东拥有公司60%的股份
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制成都利君实业股份有限公司(SZSE: 002651),了解企业的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,个人内部人士拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为71%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现下跌,则损失最大)。

As market cap fell to CN¥7.6b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着上周市值跌至76亿元人民币,内部人士面临的损失将超过该公司任何其他股东群体。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chengdu Leejun Industrial.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于成都利君实业的哪些信息。

See our latest analysis for Chengdu Leejun Industrial

查看我们对成都利君实业的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002651 Ownership Breakdown April 14th 2023
深交所:002651 所有权明细 2023 年 4 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Leejun Industrial?

关于成都利君实业,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Chengdu Leejun Industrial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Chengdu Leejun Industrial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

成都利君实业已经有机构在股权登记处。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所带来的假定验证。他们也是,有时候会错的。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,下面值得一看成都利君实业的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002651 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 14th 2023
深交所:002651 2023 年 4 月 14 日收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu Leejun Industrial. Yamin He is currently the largest shareholder, with 32% of shares outstanding. With 28% and 11% of the shares outstanding respectively, Jia He and Yong Wei are the second and third largest shareholders.

我们注意到,对冲基金对成都利君实业的投资不大。何亚敏目前是最大的股东,已发行股份的32%。嘉和永伟分别占28%和11%的已发行股份,是第二和第三大股东。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细研究表明,其中两位最大股东通过其60%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。我们目前没有收到分析师对该股的任何报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Leejun Industrial

成都利君实业的内幕所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥5.4b stake in this CN¥7.6b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

看来内部人士拥有成都利君实业股份有限公司一半以上的股票。这给了他们很大的力量。这意味着内部人士在这家76亿元的业务中拥有非常有意义的54亿元人民币股份。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否在出售他们的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司20%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Chengdu Leejun Industrial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。 我们已经发现了 1 个警告标志 与成都利君实业合作,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然 这可能不是最值得买的股票。因此,您不妨看看我们的 免费的 一系列具有良好财务状况的有趣潜在客户。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发