share_log

Is Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) A Risky Investment?

Is Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) A Risky Investment?

克利夫兰-克利夫斯(纽约证券交易所代码:CLF)是一项风险投资吗?
Simply Wall St ·  2023/03/19 09:07

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金经理李露对此毫不掩饰,他说:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久的资本损失。”因此,很明显,当你考虑任何给定股票的风险时,你需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务会使公司陷入困境。重要的是, 克利夫兰-克利夫斯公司 (纽约证券交易所代码:CLF)确实有债务。但是这笔债务是股东关心的问题吗?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时危险?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般而言,只有当公司无法通过筹集资金或使用自己的现金流轻松还清债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题。归根结底,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能会一无所有地离开。尽管这种情况并不常见,但我们经常看到负债公司永久稀释股东,因为贷款人迫使他们以不良价格筹集资金。当然,许多公司使用债务为增长提供资金,而不会产生任何负面后果。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,要做的第一件事是将现金和债务放在一起考虑。

View our latest analysis for Cleveland-Cliffs

查看我们对克利夫兰-克利夫斯的最新分析

What Is Cleveland-Cliffs's Net Debt?

克利夫兰-克利夫斯的净负债是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Cleveland-Cliffs had US$4.25b of debt in December 2022, down from US$5.24b, one year before. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

你可以点击下面的图片查看历史数字,但它显示克利夫兰-克利夫斯在2022年12月的债务为42.5亿美元,低于一年前的52.4亿美元。净负债大致相同,因为它没有太多现金。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:CLF Debt to Equity History March 19th 2023
纽约证券交易所:CLF 2023 年 3 月 19 日债务与股权比率的历史

How Healthy Is Cleveland-Cliffs' Balance Sheet?

克利夫兰-克利夫斯的资产负债表有多健康?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Cleveland-Cliffs had liabilities of US$3.55b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$7.16b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$26.0m and US$1.96b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$8.73b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

放大最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到,克利夫兰-克利夫斯在12个月内到期的负债为35.5亿美元,在此之后的负债为71.6亿美元。另一方面,它有2600万美元的现金和价值19.6亿美元的应收账款在一年内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和多出87.3亿美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$8.94b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

与其89.4亿美元的市值相比,这是一座巨大的杠杆作用。这表明,如果公司需要尽快支撑资产负债表,股东将被大幅稀释。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我们通过以下方法来衡量公司的债务负担与其盈利能力:将其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),并计算其利息和税前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的难易程度。因此,我们将债务与收益的关系考虑在内,包括和不包括折旧和摊销费用。

Cleveland-Cliffs has net debt of just 1.3 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 7.9 times the interest expense over the last year. The modesty of its debt load may become crucial for Cleveland-Cliffs if management cannot prevent a repeat of the 49% cut to EBIT over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Cleveland-Cliffs can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

克利夫兰-克利夫斯的净负债仅为息税折旧摊销前利润的1.3倍,这表明它当然不是一个鲁莽的借款人。这一观点得到了稳健的利息覆盖率的支持,息税前利润是去年利息支出的7.9倍。如果管理层无法阻止去年再次削减49%的息税前利润,那么其适度的债务负担可能对克利夫兰-克利夫斯至关重要。在还清债务方面,收入下降并不比含糖苏打水对你的健康更有用。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但最终,该业务未来的盈利能力将决定克利夫兰-克利夫斯能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Cleveland-Cliffs's free cash flow amounted to 43% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最后,尽管纳税人可能喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受冷硬现金。因此,我们总是检查息税前利润中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去三年中,克利夫兰-克利夫斯的自由现金流占其息税前利润的43%,低于我们的预期。在偿还债务方面,这并不好。

Our View

我们的观点

Mulling over Cleveland-Cliffs's attempt at (not) growing its EBIT, we're certainly not enthusiastic. But at least it's pretty decent at covering its interest expense with its EBIT; that's encouraging. Overall, we think it's fair to say that Cleveland-Cliffs has enough debt that there are some real risks around the balance sheet. If everything goes well that may pay off but the downside of this debt is a greater risk of permanent losses. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Cleveland-Cliffs is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is significant...

仔细考虑克利夫兰-克利夫斯企图(不)增加息税前利润,我们当然不热情。但至少它在用息税前利润支付利息支出方面相当不错;这令人鼓舞。总体而言,我们认为可以公平地说,克利夫兰-克利夫斯有足够的债务,资产负债表存在一些实际风险。如果一切顺利,这可能会得到回报,但这笔债务的不利之处是永久损失的风险更大。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识最多。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。请注意,克利夫兰-克利夫斯正在上演 我们的投资分析中有4个警告信号 ,其中 1 个很重要...

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

归根结底,通常最好将注意力集中在没有净负债的公司身上。您可以访问我们的此类公司的特别名单(所有公司都有利润增长记录)。它是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发