share_log

Insiders the Biggest Winners as Mabpharm Limited's (HKG:2181) Market Cap Rises to HK$2.9b

Insiders the Biggest Winners as Mabpharm Limited's (HKG:2181) Market Cap Rises to HK$2.9b

随着Mabpharm Limited(HKG: 2181)的市值升至29亿港元,业内人士是最大的赢家
Simply Wall St ·  2023/03/16 18:33

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over Mabpharm implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 68% ownership
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 对Mabpharm的重大内部控制意味着公司增长的既得利益
  • 共有2位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为68%
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

A look at the shareholders of Mabpharm Limited (HKG:2181) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 50% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Mabpharm Limited(HKG: 2181)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。持有公司股份最多的集团是个人内部人士,准确地说约为50%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$2.9b market cap following a 45% gain in the stock.

结果,内部人士上周创下最高纪录,该公司在股价上涨45%后达到了29亿港元的市值。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Mabpharm.

在下图中,我们放大了Mabpharm的不同所有权组。

Check out our latest analysis for Mabpharm

查看我们对 Mabpharm 的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2181 Ownership Breakdown March 16th 2023
SEHK: 2181 2023 年 3 月 16 日所有权明细

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mabpharm?

关于Mabpharm,缺乏机构所有权告诉我们什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们往往不会看到机构投资者持有风险很大、交易量稀少或规模很小的公司的股票。尽管我们有时会看到大公司没有注册机构,但这种情况并不特别常见。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Mabpharm's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

机构不拥有股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的情况是,相对于管理的基金,公司规模太小,因此该机构不必费心仔细观察公司。另一方面,专业投资者总是有可能因为认为公司不是最赚钱的地方而避开公司。Mabpharm的收益和收入记录(见下文)可能对机构投资者没有吸引力,或者他们可能根本没有仔细研究该业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2181 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 16th 2023
SEHK: 2181 2023 年 3 月 16 日收益与收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Mabpharm. Jianjun Guo is currently the company's largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. CDH Investment Management Company Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 18% of common stock, and Fortune Healthy Investment Limited holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

我们注意到,对冲基金对Mabpharm没有有意义的投资。郭建军目前是该公司的最大股东,拥有50%的已发行股份。CDH投资管理有限公司是第二大股东,拥有18%的普通股,财富健康投资有限公司持有该公司约5.2%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 68% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前两名股东通过其68%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Mabpharm

Mabpharm 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Mabpharm Limited. Insiders have a HK$1.5b stake in this HK$2.9b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看来内部人士拥有Mabpharm Limited的很大一部分股份。业内人士在这项29亿港元的业务中拥有15亿港元的股份。我们可以说这表明与股东保持一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小;一些内部人士可能创立了这家公司。您可以点击此处查看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司23%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 23%, private equity firms could influence the Mabpharm board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司持有23%的股份,可以影响Mabpharm董事会。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励采取帮助市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有人可能在公开投资后退出投资。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 4.0%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的4.0%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过独立的私人公司持有上市公司的股份权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Mabpharm (including 3 which can't be ignored) .

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解 4 个警告标志 我们发现了 Mabpharm(包括 3 个不容忽视的)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然 这可能不是最值得买的股票。所以来看看这个 免费的 免费的 有趣的公司名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧? 取得联系 直接和我们联系。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St 的这篇文章本质上是一般性的。 我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,我们的文章并非旨在提供财务建议。 它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未将最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简而言之,华尔街对上述任何股票都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发