share_log

Great Week for Ferguson Plc (NYSE:FERG) Institutional Investors After Losing 0.1% Over the Previous Year

Great Week for Ferguson Plc (NYSE:FERG) Institutional Investors After Losing 0.1% Over the Previous Year

对于弗格森集团(纽约证券交易所代码:FERG)机构投资者来说是美好的一周,此前他们比上年下跌了0.1%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/02/04 09:15

A look at the shareholders of Ferguson plc (NYSE:FERG) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看弗格森公司(纽约证券交易所代码:FERG)的股东,我们就知道哪个集团最有权势。而持有这块蛋糕最大份额的是拥有74%股权的机构。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,该集团将损失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 5.3% increase in share prices last week, given their one-year returns have been disappointing at 0.1%.

机构投资者会欣赏上周5.3%的股价涨幅,因为他们的一年回报率一直令人失望,只有0.1%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferguson, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下面的图表开始,更深入地研究弗格森的每一种类型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Ferguson

看看我们对弗格森的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:FERG Ownership Breakdown February 4th 2023
纽约证券交易所:FERG所有权明细2023年2月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferguson?

关于弗格森,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

We can see that Ferguson does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ferguson, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,弗格森确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,看看弗格森过去的收入轨迹是值得的(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:FERG Earnings and Revenue Growth February 4th 2023
纽约证券交易所:FERG收益和收入增长2023年2月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 5.4% of Ferguson shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.4% and 4.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有一半以上的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不关注他们的偏好。看来,弗格森5.4%的股份由对冲基金控制。这一点值得注意,因为对冲基金往往是相当活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。先锋集团(The Vanguard Group,Inc.)目前是该公司的最大股东,持有13%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有5.4%和4.5%的流通股。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在进一步挖掘后,我们发现前21名股东合计持有公司50%的股份,这表明没有单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股可以增加你的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解一只股票的预期表现也是一个很好的做法。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ferguson

弗格森的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our information suggests that Ferguson plc insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$25m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息显示,弗格森公司内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们预计内部人士只会持有它一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值2500万美元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司21%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ferguson better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ferguson has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但为了更好地了解弗格森,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。以风险为例-弗格森有3个警示标志我们认为你应该意识到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发