share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) Institutional Owners After Losing 55% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN) Institutional Owners After Losing 55% Over the Past Year

最近的上涨可能会安抚Lumen Technologies, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:LUMN)机构所有者,此前在过去一年中亏损了55%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/02/02 13:30

If you want to know who really controls Lumen Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LUMN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 77% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Lumen Technologies,Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:LUMN),那么你就得看看它的股票登记簿的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团,准确地说约为77%,是机构。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

Last week's US$228m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 55% losses.

上周2.28亿美元的市值增长可能会受到机构投资者的赞赏,特别是在经历了55%的亏损之后。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lumen Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下面的图表开始,更深入地研究Lumen Technologies的每种类型的所有者。

Check out our latest analysis for Lumen Technologies

查看我们对Lumen Technologies的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:LUMN Ownership Breakdown February 2nd 2023
纽约证券交易所:LUMN所有权明细2023年2月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lumen Technologies?

关于Lumen Technologies,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lumen Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lumen Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Lumen Technologies拥有相当多的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到Lumen Technologies的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LUMN Earnings and Revenue Growth February 2nd 2023
纽约证券交易所:LUMN收益和收入增长2023年2月2日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Lumen Technologies is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.4% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有一半以上的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不关注他们的偏好。Lumen Technologies并不属于对冲基金。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到,第一大股东是先锋集团,持有11%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有9.4%和6.0%的流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记表,我们可以看到,前16名股东控制了51%的所有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有所有权的多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Lumen Technologies

Lumen Technologies的内部人所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人的定义可能是主观的,而且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个别内部人士,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$51m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士持有Lumen Technologies,Inc.的股份不到1%。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部人士拥有价值5100万美元的股票。绝对值可能比比例份额更重要。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。你可以点击这里,看看内部人士是在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司22%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Lumen Technologies has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例-Lumen Technologies3个警示标志(和2个有点令人担忧的问题)我们认为你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发