share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Coursera, Inc. (NYSE:COUR) Institutional Owners After Losing 23% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Coursera, Inc. (NYSE:COUR) Institutional Owners After Losing 23% Over the Past Year

在过去一年中亏损了23%之后,最近的上涨可能会安抚Coursera, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:COUR)的机构所有者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/30 08:11

A look at the shareholders of Coursera, Inc. (NYSE:COUR) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Coursera,Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:COUR)的股东就能知道哪个集团最有权势。我们可以看到,机构拥有公司的最大份额,拥有54%的股权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,该集团将损失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 13% increase in share prices after a year of 23% losses as a sign that returns are likely to begin trending higher.

机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价在经历了23%的亏损后上涨13%,认为这是回报可能开始走高的迹象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Coursera.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Coursera的不同所有权组。

See our latest analysis for Coursera

查看我们对Coursera的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:COUR Ownership Breakdown January 30th 2023
纽约证券交易所:Cour所有权明细2023年1月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coursera?

关于Coursera,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,以基准来衡量自己,因此一旦一只股票被纳入主要指数,它们往往会对这只股票变得更加热情。我们预计,大多数公司都会有一些机构登记在册,特别是在它们正在增长的情况下。

We can see that Coursera does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Coursera's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,Coursera确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到Coursera的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:COUR Earnings and Revenue Growth January 30th 2023
纽约证券交易所:Cour收益和收入增长2023年1月30日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 5.2% of Coursera shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that Baillie Gifford & Co. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 11% of the stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。Coursera 5.2%的股份似乎由对冲基金控制。这一点值得注意,因为对冲基金往往是相当活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。我们的数据显示,Baillie Gifford&Co.是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东分别持有约12%和11%的股份。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前6名股东占到了股东名册的一半以上,少数小股东在一定程度上平衡了大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Coursera

Coursera的内部人所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人的定义可能是主观的,而且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个别内部人士,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Coursera, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$168m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告,内部人士确实持有Coursera,Inc.的股份。这是一家大公司,所以看到这种程度的结盟是件好事。内部人士持有价值1.68亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果你想探讨内部人结盟的问题,你可以点击这里,看看内部人是一直在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Coursera. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公众通常是个人投资者,他们持有Coursera 11%的股份。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 22%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

拥有22%股权的私募股权公司有能力在塑造专注于价值创造的公司战略方面发挥作用。一些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私人股本有时是让管理层承担责任的积极分子。但在其他时候,私募股权公司让公司上市后,它们的股票都卖光了。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Coursera you should know about.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑一下风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现Coursera的3个警告标志你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发