-
市场
-
产品
-
资讯
-
Moo社区
-
课堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介绍
-
费用费用透明,无最低余额限制
投资选择、功能介绍、费用相关信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 浅色
Alight (NYSE:ALIT) Versus Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT) Financial Analysis
Alight (NYSE:ALIT) Versus Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT) Financial Analysis
Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT – Get Rating) and Alight (NYSE:ALIT – Get Rating) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.
Profitability
This table compares Lyft and Alight's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Get Lyft alerts:Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
Lyft | -32.26% | -54.39% | -12.18% |
Alight | 2.46% | 3.65% | 1.67% |
Analyst Recommendations
This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Lyft and Alight, as reported by MarketBeat.
Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
Lyft | 1 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 2.43 |
Alight | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3.00 |
Institutional and Insider Ownership
79.4% of Lyft shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Alight shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Lyft shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Alight shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Volatility & Risk
Lyft has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alight has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Lyft and Alight's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
Lyft | $3.21 billion | 1.82 | -$1.06 billion | ($3.58) | -4.52 |
Alight | $2.92 billion | 1.81 | -$60.00 million | $0.16 | 59.19 |
Alight has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lyft. Lyft is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Alight beats Lyft on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Lyft
(Get Rating)
Lyft, Inc. engages in the provision and management of an online social rideshare community platform. It provides access to a network of shared bikes and scooters for shorter rides and first-mile and last-mile legs of multimodal trips, information about nearby public transit routes, and Lyft Rentals to offer riders a view of transportation options when planning any trip. The company was founded by Marcus Cohn, John Zimmer, Rajat Suri, Matt van Horn, and Logan Green in 2007 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA.
About Alight
(Get Rating)
Alight, Inc. operates as a cloud-based provider of integrated digital human capital and business solutions worldwide. It operates through three segments: Employer Solutions, Professional Services, and Hosted Business. The company's solutions enable employees to enrich their health, wealth, and wellbeing, which helps organizations achieve a high-performance culture. It offers employer solutions comprising integrated benefits administration, healthcare navigation, financial health, employee wellbeing, and payroll; and professional services, including cloud deployment and consulting offerings that provides human capital and financial platforms, as well as cloud advisory and deployment, and optimization services for cloud platforms, such as Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle, and Cornerstone OnDemand. Alight, Inc. was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.
Receive News & Ratings for Lyft Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Lyft and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT – Get Rating) and Alight (NYSE:ALIT – Get Rating) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.
Lyft(纳斯达克:Lyft-Get Rating)和Alight(NYSE:ALIT-GET Rating)都是中型计算机和科技公司,但哪种投资更好?我们将根据这两家公司的风险、分析师建议、股息、机构所有权、收益、估值和盈利能力对它们进行比较。
Profitability
盈利能力
This table compares Lyft and Alight's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
下表比较了Lyft和Allight的净利润率、股本回报率和资产回报率。
Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
Lyft | -32.26% | -54.39% | -12.18% |
Alight | 2.46% | 3.65% | 1.67% |
净利润率 | 股本回报率 | 资产回报率 | |
Lyft | -32.26% | -54.39% | -12.18% |
下了车 | 2.46% | 3.65% | 1.67% |
Analyst Recommendations
分析师建议
This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Lyft and Alight, as reported by MarketBeat.
据MarketBeat报道,这是对Lyft和Light的当前建议的细分。
Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
Lyft | 1 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 2.43 |
Alight | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3.00 |
销售评级 | 保持评级 | 购买评级 | 强劲的买入评级 | 评级分数 | |
Lyft | 1 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 2.43 |
下了车 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3.00 |
Institutional and Insider Ownership
机构和内部人持股
79.4% of Lyft shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Alight shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Lyft shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Alight shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Lyft 79.4%的股份由机构投资者持有。相比之下,95.7%的轻型股由机构投资者持有。Lyft 3.3%的股份由公司内部人士持有。相比之下,空客4.0%的股份由公司内部人士持有。强大的机构持股表明,对冲基金、大型基金管理公司和捐赠基金相信,一只股票有望实现长期增长。
Volatility & Risk
波动性与风险
Lyft has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alight has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Lyft的贝塔系数为1.53,表明其股价的波动性比标准普尔500指数高53%。相比之下,Allight的贝塔系数为0.67,这表明其股价的波动性比标准普尔500指数低33%。
Earnings and Valuation
收益和估值
This table compares Lyft and Alight's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
下表比较了Lyft和Alight的毛收入、每股收益和估值。
Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
Lyft | $3.21 billion | 1.82 | -$1.06 billion | ($3.58) | -4.52 |
Alight | $2.92 billion | 1.81 | -$60.00 million | $0.16 | 59.19 |
总收入 | 价格/销售额比 | 净收入 | 每股收益 | 市盈率 | |
Lyft | 32.1亿美元 | 1.82 | -10.6亿美元 | ($3.58) | -4.52 |
下了车 | 29.2亿美元 | 1.81 | -6,000万元 | $0.16 | 59.19 |
Alight has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lyft. Lyft is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alight, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Allight的收入低于Lyft,但收益高于Lyft。Lyft目前的市盈率低于Allight,表明它目前是两只股票中更负担得起的一只。
Summary
摘要
Alight beats Lyft on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
在两只股票之间进行比较的14个因素中,有9个因素的表现优于Lyft。
About Lyft
关于Lyft
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
Lyft, Inc. engages in the provision and management of an online social rideshare community platform. It provides access to a network of shared bikes and scooters for shorter rides and first-mile and last-mile legs of multimodal trips, information about nearby public transit routes, and Lyft Rentals to offer riders a view of transportation options when planning any trip. The company was founded by Marcus Cohn, John Zimmer, Rajat Suri, Matt van Horn, and Logan Green in 2007 and is headquartered in San Francisco, CA.
Lyft,Inc.致力于提供和管理在线社交拼车社区平台。它提供短途骑行的共享自行车和滑板车网络,以及多式联运旅行的第一英里和最后一英里路段,有关附近公共交通路线的信息,以及Lyft租赁,让骑车者在计划任何旅行时都能看到交通选择。该公司由马库斯·科恩、约翰·齐默、拉贾特·苏瑞、马特·范·霍恩和洛根·格林于2007年创立,总部设在加利福尼亚州旧金山。
About Alight
关于落车
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
Alight, Inc. operates as a cloud-based provider of integrated digital human capital and business solutions worldwide. It operates through three segments: Employer Solutions, Professional Services, and Hosted Business. The company's solutions enable employees to enrich their health, wealth, and wellbeing, which helps organizations achieve a high-performance culture. It offers employer solutions comprising integrated benefits administration, healthcare navigation, financial health, employee wellbeing, and payroll; and professional services, including cloud deployment and consulting offerings that provides human capital and financial platforms, as well as cloud advisory and deployment, and optimization services for cloud platforms, such as Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle, and Cornerstone OnDemand. Alight, Inc. was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Lincolnshire, Illinois.
Alight,Inc.是一家基于云的供应商,在全球范围内提供集成数字人力资本和业务解决方案。它通过三个细分市场运作:雇主解决方案、专业服务和托管业务。该公司的解决方案使员工能够丰富他们的健康、财富和福祉,这有助于组织实现高绩效文化。它提供雇主解决方案,包括集成的福利管理、医疗导航、财务健康、员工福利和工资;以及专业服务,包括提供人力资本和财务平台的云部署和咨询产品,以及针对Workday、SAP SuccessFtors、Oracle和Cornerstone OnDemand等云平台的云咨询和部署以及优化服务。Alight,Inc.成立于2017年,总部位于伊利诺伊州林肯郡。
Receive News & Ratings for Lyft Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Lyft and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
接受Lyft Daily的新闻和评级-在下面输入您的电子邮件地址,通过MarketBeat.com的免费每日电子邮件时事通讯接收对Lyft和相关公司的最新新闻和分析师评级的每日简要摘要。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国,moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美国证券交易委员会(SEC)监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局(FINRA)和证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)的成员。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,该公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ,持有财务顾问豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚,moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构(AFSL No. 224663)。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件,这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大,通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,并受加拿大投资监管机构(CIRO)监管。
在马来西亚,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会(SC)监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
风险及免责提示
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国,moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美国证券交易委员会(SEC)监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局(FINRA)和证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)的成员。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,该公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ,持有财务顾问豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚,moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构(AFSL No. 224663)。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件,这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大,通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,并受加拿大投资监管机构(CIRO)监管。
在马来西亚,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会(SC)监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用浏览器的分享功能,分享给你的好友吧