share_log

Is Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:OLPX) Trading At A 36% Discount?

Is Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:OLPX) Trading At A 36% Discount?

Olaplex Holdings, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:OLPX)的交易折扣是否为36%?
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/19 09:31

Does the January share price for Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:OLPX) reflect what it's really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock's intrinsic value by taking the expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. One way to achieve this is by employing the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Before you think you won't be able to understand it, just read on! It's actually much less complex than you'd imagine.

奥莱普莱斯控股公司(纳斯达克代码:OLPX)1月份的股价反映了它的真实价值吗?今天,我们将通过获取预期的未来现金流并将其贴现到其现值来估计股票的内在价值。实现这一点的一种方法是使用贴现现金流(DCF)模型。在你认为你将无法理解它之前,只需继续阅读!它实际上比你想象的要简单得多。

We would caution that there are many ways of valuing a company and, like the DCF, each technique has advantages and disadvantages in certain scenarios. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model.

我们要提醒的是,对一家公司进行估值的方法有很多种,与贴现现金流一样,每种方法在某些情况下都有优缺点。任何有兴趣了解更多内在价值的人,都应该阅读一下Simply Wall St.的分析模型。

Check out our latest analysis for Olaplex Holdings

查看我们对Olaplex Holdings的最新分析

The Model

模型

We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.

我们使用所谓的两阶段模型,也就是说,公司的现金流有两个不同的增长率。一般来说,第一阶段是较高增长阶段,第二阶段是较低增长阶段。首先,我们必须对未来十年的现金流进行估计。在可能的情况下,我们使用分析师的估计,但当这些估计不可用时,我们会根据上次估计或报告的价值推断先前的自由现金流(FCF)。我们假设,自由现金流萎缩的公司将减缓收缩速度,而自由现金流增长的公司在这段时间内的增长速度将放缓。我们这样做是为了反映出,增长在最初几年往往比后来几年放缓得更多。

Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, and so the sum of these future cash flows is then discounted to today's value:

一般来说,我们假设今天的一美元比未来的一美元更有价值,所以这些未来现金流的总和就会贴现到今天的价值:

10-year free cash flow (FCF) forecast

10年自由现金流(FCF)预测

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Levered FCF ($, Millions) US$287.0m US$305.5m US$311.5m US$419.0m US$427.5m US$435.6m US$443.9m US$452.5m US$461.3m US$470.4m
Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x3 Analyst x2 Analyst x2 Analyst x2 Analyst x2 Est @ 1.89% Est @ 1.92% Est @ 1.93% Est @ 1.95% Est @ 1.96%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 8.2% US$265 US$261 US$246 US$306 US$289 US$272 US$256 US$241 US$228 US$215
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
杠杆式FCF(百万美元) 2.87亿美元 3.055亿美元 3.115亿美元 4.19亿美元 4.275亿美元 4.356亿美元 4.439亿美元 4.525亿美元 4.613亿美元 4.704亿美元
增长率预估来源 分析师x3 分析师x2 分析师x2 分析师x2 分析师x2 Est@1.89% Est@1.92% Est@1.93% Est@1.95% Est@1.96%
现值(美元,百万)贴现@8.2% 265美元 261美元 246美元 306美元 289美元 272美元 256美元 241美元 228美元 215美元

("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$2.6b

(“EST”=Simply Wall St.预估的FCF成长率)
10年期现金流现值(PVCF)=26亿美元

The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 2.0%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 8.2%.

第二阶段也被称为终端价值,这是企业在第一阶段之后的现金流。戈登增长公式用于计算终端价值,其未来年增长率等于10年期政府债券收益率2.0%的5年平均水平。我们以8.2%的权益成本将终端现金流贴现到今天的价值。

Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2032 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$470m× (1 + 2.0%) ÷ (8.2%– 2.0%) = US$7.8b

终端值(TV)=FCF2032×(1+g)?(r-g)=4.7亿美元×(1+2.0%)?(8.2%-2.0%)=78亿美元

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$7.8b÷ ( 1 + 8.2%)10= US$3.5b

终值现值(PVTV)=TV/(1+r)10=78亿美元?(1+8.2%)10=35亿美元

The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$6.1b. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$6.0, the company appears quite good value at a 36% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.

那么,总价值或权益价值就是未来现金流的现值之和,在这种情况下,现金流的现值为61亿美元。为了得到每股内在价值,我们将其除以总流通股数量。相对于目前6.0美元的股价,该公司的价值似乎相当不错,较目前的股价有36%的折让。任何计算中的假设都会对估值产生很大影响,因此最好将其视为粗略估计,而不是精确到最后一分钱。

dcf
NasdaqGS:OLPX Discounted Cash Flow January 19th 2023
NasdaqGS:OLPX贴现现金流2023年1月19日

Important Assumptions

重要假设

We would point out that the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate and of course the actual cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Olaplex Holdings as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 8.2%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.029. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

我们要指出,贴现现金流最重要的投入是贴现率,当然还有实际现金流。如果你不同意这些结果,你可以自己试一试计算,并玩弄一下假设。DCF也没有考虑一个行业可能的周期性,也没有考虑一家公司未来的资本要求,因此它没有给出一家公司潜在业绩的全貌。鉴于我们将Olaplex Holdings视为潜在股东,股权成本被用作贴现率,而不是占债务的资本成本(或加权平均资本成本,WACC)。在这个计算中,我们使用了8.2%,这是基于杠杆率为1.029的测试值。贝塔系数是衡量一只股票相对于整个市场的波动性的指标。我们的贝塔系数来自全球可比公司的行业平均贝塔系数,强制限制在0.8到2.0之间,这是一个稳定业务的合理范围。

SWOT Analysis for Olaplex Holdings

Olaplex Holdings的SWOT分析

Strength
强度
  • Earnings growth over the past year exceeded the industry.
  • 过去一年的收益增长超过了行业。
  • Debt is well covered by earnings and cashflows.
  • 债务由收益和现金流很好地覆盖了。
  • Balance sheet summary for OLPX.
  • OLPX的资产负债表摘要。
Weakness
软肋
  • No major weaknesses identified for OLPX.
  • 没有发现OLPX的主要弱点。
Opportunity
机会
  • Annual earnings are forecast to grow for the next 4 years.
  • 预计未来4年的年收入将会增长。
  • Good value based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value.
  • 基于市盈率和估计公允价值的良好价值。
Threat
威胁
  • Annual earnings are forecast to grow slower than the American market.
  • 据预测,该公司的年收入增速将低于美国市场。
  • What else are analysts forecasting for OLPX?
  • 分析师们对OLPX还有什么预测?

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. DCF models are not the be-all and end-all of investment valuation. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" For instance, if the terminal value growth rate is adjusted slightly, it can dramatically alter the overall result. Can we work out why the company is trading at a discount to intrinsic value? For Olaplex Holdings, we've compiled three relevant elements you should further research:

就构建你的投资论点而言,估值只是硬币的一面,它只是你需要为一家公司评估的众多因素之一。贴现现金流模型并不是投资估值的全部。相反,它应该被视为“什么假设需要成立才能让这只股票被低估或高估”的指南。例如,如果终端价值增长率稍有调整,可能会极大地改变整体结果。我们能弄清楚为什么该公司的股价低于内在价值吗?对于Olaplex Holdings,我们收集了三个你应该进一步研究的相关元素:

  1. Risks: Case in point, we've spotted 1 warning sign for Olaplex Holdings you should be aware of.
  2. Future Earnings: How does OLPX's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
  3. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!
  1. 风险:例如,我们已经发现了Olaplex Holdings的1个警告标志你应该意识到。
  2. 未来收益:与同行和更广泛的市场相比,OLPX的增长率如何?通过与我们的免费分析师增长预期图表互动,更深入地挖掘分析师对未来几年的共识数字。
  3. 其他高质量替代产品:你喜欢一个好的全能运动员吗?浏览我们的高质量股票互动列表,了解您可能会错过的其他股票!

PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every American stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.

PS.Simply Wall St.每天更新每只美国股票的贴现现金流计算,所以如果你想找出任何其他股票的内在价值,只需搜索此处。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发