share_log

With 34% Ownership in Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 34% Ownership in Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

机构投资者拥有Bioma Fusion, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:BMEA)34%的所有权,该业务受益匪浅
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/19 09:05

If you want to know who really controls Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 34% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Biomea Fusion,Inc.(纳斯达克代码:BMEA),那么你就得看看它的股票登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有公司的最大份额,拥有34%的股权。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$64m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 27%.

在该公司上周市值上涨6400万美元后,机构投资者的情况正在好转。上周的涨幅将进一步提高一年的股东回报率,目前股东回报率为27%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Biomea Fusion.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们什么关于Biomea Fusion。

See our latest analysis for Biomea Fusion

查看我们对Biomea Fusion的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:BMEA Ownership Breakdown January 19th 2023
NasdaqGS:BMEA所有权明细2023年1月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Biomea Fusion?

关于Biomea Fusion,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

Biomea Fusion already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Biomea Fusion's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Biomea Fusion已经在股票登记处登记了机构。事实上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到Biomea Fusion的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:BMEA Earnings and Revenue Growth January 19th 2023
NasdaqGS:BMEA收益和收入增长2023年1月19日

It looks like hedge funds own 18% of Biomea Fusion shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is A2A Pharmaceuticals, Inc., with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 9.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Thomas Butler, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

看起来对冲基金拥有Biomea Fusion 18%的股份。这一点值得注意,因为对冲基金往往是相当活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期看到价值创造(以及更高的股价)。该公司的最大股东是A2A制药公司,持有15%的股份。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有11%和9.6%的流通股。此外,我们发现,首席执行官托马斯·巴特勒有1.1%的股份分配给了他们的名字。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查后,我们发现该公司超过一半的股份由前7名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小股东平衡了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股可以增加你的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解一只股票的预期表现也是一个很好的做法。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Biomea Fusion

Biomea Fusion的内部人所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Biomea Fusion, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$3.9m worth of stock in the US$276m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士持有Biomea Fusion,Inc.的一些股份。内部人士以自己的名义持有这家市值2.76亿美元的公司价值390万美元的股票。这至少表明了一些一致。你可以点击这里,看看这些内部人士是一直在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司32%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the Biomea Fusion stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

似乎私营公司拥有Biomea Fusion 15%的股份。或许有必要对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,如内部人士,对这些私营公司中的一家有利害关系,则应在年报中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Biomea Fusion you should be aware of, and 2 of them make us uncomfortable.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。一个恰当的例子:我们发现了生物群融合的4个警告信号你应该知道,其中两个让我们感到不舒服。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更愿意了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这一预期免费关于分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发