share_log

Private Equity Firms Who Own 57% Along With Institutions Invested in Bright Health Group, Inc. (NYSE:BHG) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Private Equity Firms Who Own 57% Along With Institutions Invested in Bright Health Group, Inc. (NYSE:BHG) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

持有57%的私募股权公司以及投资于Bright Health Group, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:BHG)的机构上周的持股价值有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/18 08:05

If you want to know who really controls Bright Health Group, Inc. (NYSE:BHG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了光明健康集团(纽约证券交易所代码:BHG),那么你就得看看它的股票登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,私募股权公司以57%的股权拥有该公司的最大份额。换句话说,该集团将从他们对公司的投资中获得最大(或损失最大)。

While private equity firms were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$156m market cap gain, institutions too had a 20% share in those profits.

尽管私募股权公司是上周1.56亿美元市值增长的最大受益者,但机构也在这些利润中占有20%的份额。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bright Health Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于光明健康集团的什么。

See our latest analysis for Bright Health Group

查看我们对光明健康集团的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BHG Ownership Breakdown January 18th 2023
纽约证券交易所:BHG所有权明细2023年1月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bright Health Group?

关于光明健康集团,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bright Health Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Bright Health Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在光明健康集团拥有相当多的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,下面是光明健康集团的盈利历史,值得一看。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BHG Earnings and Revenue Growth January 18th 2023
纽约证券交易所:BHG收益和收入增长2023年1月18日

Bright Health Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is New Enterprise Associates, Inc., with ownership of 37%. With 13% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Deer Management Company, LLC and StepStone Group Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

光明健康集团不属于对冲基金。该公司的最大股东是New Enterprise Associates,Inc.,持有37%的股份。Deer Management Company、LLC和StepStone Group Inc.分别持有13%和6.6%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股东。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了让我们的研究更有趣,我们发现,前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有相当数量的分析师追踪该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of Bright Health Group

光明健康集团的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Bright Health Group, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$34m worth of the US$653m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士持有光明健康集团的一些股份。作为个人,这些内部人士总共拥有这家市值6.53亿美元的公司3400万美元的股份。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但或许值得一查的是,这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bright Health Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有18%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对光明健康集团有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

Private equity firms hold a 57% stake in Bright Health Group. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有光明健康集团57%的股份。这表明,他们可以在关键的政策决策中发挥影响力。一些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私人股本有时是让管理层承担责任的积极分子。但在其他时候,私募股权公司让公司上市后,它们的股票都卖光了。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Bright Health Group has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例-光明健康集团2个警告标志我们认为你应该意识到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发