share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Institutional Owners After Losing 0.9% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Institutional Owners After Losing 0.9% Over the Past Year

在过去一年下跌0.9%之后,最近的上涨可能会安抚UFP Industries, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:UFPI)的机构所有者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/14 08:50

A look at the shareholders of UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看UFP工业公司(纳斯达克:UFP)的股东就能知道哪个集团最有权势。而持有这块蛋糕最大份额的是拥有84%股权的机构。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 5.3% increase in share prices last week, given their one-year returns have been disappointing at 0.9%.

机构投资者会欣赏上周5.3%的股价涨幅,因为他们的一年回报率一直令人失望,仅为0.9%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about UFP Industries.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们什么关于UFP Industries。

View our latest analysis for UFP Industries

查看我们对UFP行业的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:UFPI Ownership Breakdown January 14th 2023
NasdaqGS:UFPI所有权明细2023年1月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UFP Industries?

关于UFP产业,机构所有制告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in UFP Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at UFP Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所见,机构投资者在UFP Industries拥有相当数量的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面UFP Industries的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:UFPI Earnings and Revenue Growth January 13th 2023
NasdaqGS:UFPI收益和收入增长2023年1月13日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in UFP Industries. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. holds about 4.4% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Matthew Missad is the owner of 0.5% of the company's shares.

由于机构投资者拥有一半以上的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不关注他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对UFP Industries进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,贝莱德股份有限公司是第一大股东,持有17%的流通股。先锋集团是第二大股东,持有12%的普通股,T.Rowe Price Group,Inc.持有约4.4%的公司股票。此外,首席执行官马修·米萨德持有该公司0.5%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步考察,我们发现,该公司超过一半的股份由前十大股东持有,这表明大股东的利益在一定程度上被小股东平衡了。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of UFP Industries

UFP产业的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in UFP Industries, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$129m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士持有UFP Industries,Inc.的一些股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的结盟通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约1.29亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到内部人士的投资达到这样的水平是件好事。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in UFP Industries. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,他们持有UFP Industries 14%的股份。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for UFP Industries you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,考虑一下风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现一个UFP行业的警告标志你应该知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你更愿意了解分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这一预期免费关于分析师预测的报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发