share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTNX) Institutional Owners After Losing 7.7% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTNX) Institutional Owners After Losing 7.7% Over the Past Year

在过去一年中下跌7.7%之后,最近的上涨可能会安抚Nutanix, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:NTNX)的机构所有者
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/13 09:10

If you want to know who really controls Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTNX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 77% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道谁真正控制了Nutanix公司(纳斯达克代码:NTNX),那么你就得看看它的股票登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司77%的所有权,拥有最大份额。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,该集团将损失最大)。

After a year of 7.7% losses, last week's 4.9% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a likely sign that returns might start trending higher.

在经历了7.7%的亏损后,上周4.9%的涨幅将受到机构投资者的欢迎,因为这可能是回报率可能开始走高的迹象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nutanix.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Nutanix的不同所有权组。

Check out our latest analysis for Nutanix

查看我们对Nutanix的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:NTNX Ownership Breakdown January 13th 2023
NasdaqGS:NTNX所有权明细2023年1月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nutanix?

关于Nutanix,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Nutanix. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nutanix's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Nutanix拥有相当多的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,下面我们有必要看看Nutanix的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:NTNX Earnings and Revenue Growth January 13th 2023
纳斯达克:NTNX收益和收入增长2023年1月13日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nutanix. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 15%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 9.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有一半以上的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不关注他们的偏好。对冲基金在Nutanix持有的股份并不多。该公司的最大股东是FMR LLC,持有15%的股份。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有11%和9.2%的流通股。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们做了更多的挖掘,发现9个大股东约占登记的51%,这意味着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。相当多的分析师追踪这只股票,所以你可以很容易地研究预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Nutanix

Nutanix的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Nutanix, Inc. in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$40m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己的名义持有Nutanix,Inc.不到1%的股份。它是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员有可能在该公司拥有有意义的权益,而不是拥有太多按比例分配的权益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约4000万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司22%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Nutanix (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑一下无处不在的投资风险幽灵。我们已经确定了4个警告信号对于Nutanix(至少1个,这让我们有点不舒服),理解它们应该是你投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费分析师对该公司的预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发