share_log

Are Investors Undervaluing Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:GDYN) By 21%?

Are Investors Undervaluing Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:GDYN) By 21%?

投资者是否将Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:GDYN)的估值低估了21%?
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/11 07:05

Today we will run through one way of estimating the intrinsic value of Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:GDYN) by projecting its future cash flows and then discounting them to today's value. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model is the tool we will apply to do this. Before you think you won't be able to understand it, just read on! It's actually much less complex than you'd imagine.

今天我们将介绍一种估算电网动力控股公司(纳斯达克代码:GDYN)内在价值的方法,即预测其未来现金流,然后将其折现为今天的价值。贴现现金流(DCF)模型是我们将应用的工具。在你认为你将无法理解它之前,只需继续阅读!它实际上比你想象的要简单得多。

Companies can be valued in a lot of ways, so we would point out that a DCF is not perfect for every situation. If you want to learn more about discounted cash flow, the rationale behind this calculation can be read in detail in the Simply Wall St analysis model.

对公司的估值可以有很多种方式,因此我们要指出,贴现现金流并不适用于每一种情况。如果你想了解更多关于贴现现金流的信息,可以在Simply Wall St.分析模型中详细阅读这种计算背后的原理。

See our latest analysis for Grid Dynamics Holdings

请参阅我们对网格动态控股公司的最新分析

The Calculation

计算

We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second 'steady growth' period. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.

我们将使用两阶段贴现现金流模型,顾名思义,该模型考虑了两个增长阶段。第一阶段通常是一个较高的成长期,接近终值,在第二个“稳定增长”阶段捕捉到。首先,我们需要估计未来十年的现金流。在可能的情况下,我们使用分析师的估计,但当这些估计不可用时,我们会根据上次估计或报告的价值推断先前的自由现金流(FCF)。我们假设,自由现金流萎缩的公司将减缓收缩速度,而自由现金流增长的公司在这段时间内的增长速度将放缓。我们这样做是为了反映出,增长在最初几年往往比后来几年放缓得更多。

Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we discount the value of these future cash flows to their estimated value in today's dollars:

一般来说,我们假设今天的一美元比未来的一美元更有价值,所以我们将这些未来现金流的价值贴现到以今天美元计算的估计价值:

10-year free cash flow (FCF) forecast

10年自由现金流(FCF)预测

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Levered FCF ($, Millions) US$32.0m US$42.0m US$49.5m US$56.1m US$61.6m US$66.2m US$70.0m US$73.3m US$76.1m US$78.6m
Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x1 Analyst x1 Est @ 17.96% Est @ 13.17% Est @ 9.81% Est @ 7.46% Est @ 5.82% Est @ 4.67% Est @ 3.86% Est @ 3.30%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 8.0% US$29.6 US$36.0 US$39.4 US$41.3 US$42.0 US$41.8 US$41.0 US$39.7 US$38.2 US$36.6
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
杠杆式FCF(百万美元) 3200万美元 4200万美元 4950万美元 5610万美元 6160万美元 6620万美元 700万美元 7330万美元 7610万美元 7860万美元
增长率预估来源 分析师x1 分析师x1 Est@17.96% Est@13.17% Est@9.81% Est@7.46% Est@5.82% Est@4.67% Est@3.86% Est@3.30%
现值(美元,百万)贴现@8.0% 29.6美元 36.0美元 39.4美元 41.3美元 42.0美元 41.8美元 41.0美元 39.7美元 38.2美元 36.6美元

("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$386m

(“EST”=Simply Wall St.预估的FCF成长率)
10年期现金流现值(PVCF)=3.86亿美元

After calculating the present value of future cash flows in the initial 10-year period, we need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all future cash flows beyond the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 2.0%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 8.0%.

在计算了最初10年内未来现金流的现值后,我们需要计算终止值,它考虑了第一阶段之后的所有未来现金流。戈登增长公式用于计算终端价值,其未来年增长率等于10年期政府债券收益率2.0%的5年平均水平。我们以8.0%的权益成本将终端现金流贴现到今天的价值。

Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2032 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$79m× (1 + 2.0%) ÷ (8.0%– 2.0%) = US$1.3b

终端值(TV)=FCF2032×(1+g)?(r-g)=7900万美元×(1+2.0%)?(8.0%-2.0%)=13亿美元

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$1.3b÷ ( 1 + 8.0%)10= US$623m

终值现值(PVTV)=TV/(1+r)10=13亿美元?(1+8.0%)10=6.23亿美元

The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$1.0b. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Compared to the current share price of US$10.8, the company appears a touch undervalued at a 21% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Valuations are imprecise instruments though, rather like a telescope - move a few degrees and end up in a different galaxy. Do keep this in mind.

那么,总价值或股权价值就是未来现金流的现值之和,在这种情况下,未来现金流的现值为10亿美元。为了得到每股内在价值,我们将其除以总流通股数量。与目前10.8美元的股价相比,该公司的估值似乎略有低估,较目前的股价有21%的折让。然而,估值是不精确的工具,更像是一台望远镜--移动几度,就会到达另一个星系。一定要记住这一点。

dcf
NasdaqCM:GDYN Discounted Cash Flow January 11th 2023
NasdaqCM:GDYN贴现现金流2023年1月11日

Important Assumptions

重要假设

The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Grid Dynamics Holdings as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 8.0%, which is based on a levered beta of 0.995. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

上述计算在很大程度上取决于两个假设。第一个是贴现率,另一个是现金流。您不必同意这些输入,我建议您自己重新计算并使用它们。DCF也没有考虑一个行业可能的周期性,也没有考虑一家公司未来的资本要求,因此它没有给出一家公司潜在业绩的全貌。鉴于我们将Grid Dynamic Holdings视为潜在股东,股权成本被用作贴现率,而不是占债务的资本成本(或加权平均资本成本,WACC)。在这个计算中,我们使用了8.0%,这是基于杠杆率为0.995的测试版。贝塔系数是衡量一只股票相对于整个市场的波动性的指标。我们的贝塔系数来自全球可比公司的行业平均贝塔系数,强制限制在0.8到2.0之间,这是一个稳定业务的合理范围。

SWOT Analysis for Grid Dynamics Holdings

电网动力控股的SWOT分析

Strength
强度
  • Currently debt free.
  • 目前没有债务。
  • Balance sheet summary for GDYN.
  • GDYN的资产负债表摘要。
Weakness
软肋
  • Shareholders have been diluted in the past year.
  • 在过去的一年里,股东被稀释了。
  • See GDYN's current ownership breakdown.
  • 参见GDYN目前的所有权细目。
Opportunity
机会
  • Expected to breakeven next year.
  • 预计明年将实现盈亏平衡。
  • Has sufficient cash runway for more than 3 years based on current free cash flows.
  • 根据目前的自由现金流,拥有足够的现金跑道超过3年。
  • Trading below our estimate of fair value by more than 20%.
  • 交易价格比我们估计的公允价值低20%以上。
Threat
威胁
  • No apparent threats visible for GDYN.
  • GDYN看不到明显的威胁。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

Whilst important, the DCF calculation is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. DCF models are not the be-all and end-all of investment valuation. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. Why is the intrinsic value higher than the current share price? For Grid Dynamics Holdings, we've put together three essential factors you should assess:

虽然贴现现金流的计算很重要,但它只是一家公司需要评估的众多因素之一。贴现现金流模型并不是投资估值的全部。相反,它应该被视为“什么假设需要成立才能让这只股票被低估或高估”的指南。如果一家公司以不同的速度增长,或者如果其股本成本或无风险利率大幅变化,产出可能看起来非常不同。为什么内在价值高于当前股价?对于Grid Dynamic Holdings,我们总结了三个你应该评估的基本因素:

  1. Risks: Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Grid Dynamics Holdings , and understanding these should be part of your investment process.
  2. Management:Have insiders been ramping up their shares to take advantage of the market's sentiment for GDYN's future outlook? Check out our management and board analysis with insights on CEO compensation and governance factors.
  3. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!
  1. 风险例如,考虑一下一直存在的投资风险幽灵。我们已经确定了两个警告信号与Grid Dynamic Holdings合作,了解这些应该是您投资过程的一部分。
  2. 管理:内部人士是否一直在增持股票,以利用市场对GDYN未来前景的情绪?查看我们的管理层和董事会分析,了解对CEO薪酬和治理因素的见解。
  3. 其他高质量替代产品:你喜欢一个好的全能运动员吗?浏览我们的高质量股票互动列表,了解您可能会错过的其他股票!

PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every American stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.

PS.Simply Wall St.每天更新每只美国股票的贴现现金流计算,所以如果你想找出任何其他股票的内在价值,只需搜索此处。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发