-
市场
-
产品
-
资讯
-
Moo社区
-
课堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介绍
-
费用费用透明，无最低余额限制
投资选择、功能介绍、费用相关信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 浅色
Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) & BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) Critical Analysis
Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) & BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD) Critical Analysis
BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD – Get Rating) and Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG – Get Rating) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.
Insider and Institutional Ownership
0.1% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Sweetgreen shares are held by institutional investors. 15.6% of BT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.5% of Sweetgreen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Get BT Brands alerts:Volatility & Risk
BT Brands has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sweetgreen has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for BT Brands and Sweetgreen, as provided by MarketBeat.com.| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| BT Brands | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Sweetgreen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Sweetgreen has a consensus target price of 19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 123.79%. Given Sweetgreen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sweetgreen is more favorable than BT Brands.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares BT Brands and Sweetgreen's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| BT Brands | $8.45 million | 1.38 | $610,000.00 | ($0.04) | -45.25 |
| Sweetgreen | $339.87 million | 2.77 | -$153.18 million | -2.38 | -3.57 |
BT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sweetgreen. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sweetgreen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Profitability
This table compares BT Brands and Sweetgreen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| BT Brands | -1.16% | -1.47% | -1.02% |
| Sweetgreen | -45.27% | -30.98% | -26.19% |
Summary
Sweetgreen beats BT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
About BT Brands
(Get Rating)
BT Brands, Inc. owns and operates fast-food restaurants in the north central region of United States. The company operates nine Burger Time restaurants located in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota; and a Dairy Queen franchise in Ham Lake, Minnesota. Its Burger Time restaurants provide various burgers and other food products, such as chicken sandwiches, pulled pork sandwiches, side dishes, and soft drinks; and Dairy Queen restaurant offers burgers, chicken, sides, ice cream and other desserts, and various beverages. The company was founded in 1987 and is based in West Fargo, North Dakota.
About Sweetgreen
(Get Rating)
Sweetgreen, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops and operates fast-casual restaurants serving healthy foods prepared from seasonal and organic ingredients. The company also accepts orders through its online and mobile ordering platforms, as well as sells gift cards that can be redeemed in its restaurants. As of September 26, 2021, it owned and operated 140 restaurants in 13 states and Washington, D.C. The company was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
Receive News & Ratings for BT Brands Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for BT Brands and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD – Get Rating) and Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG – Get Rating) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.
英国电信品牌(纳斯达克：btbd-获得评级)和Sweetgreen(纽约证券交易所代码：SG-获得评级)都是小盘零售/批发公司，但哪种股票更好？我们将根据两家公司的机构所有权、分析师建议、估值、盈利能力、股息、收益和风险等方面的实力进行比较。
Insider and Institutional Ownership
内部人与机构持股
0.1% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Sweetgreen shares are held by institutional investors. 15.6% of BT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.5% of Sweetgreen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
英国电信品牌0.1%的股份由机构投资者持有。相比之下，Sweetgreen 84.3%的股份由机构投资者持有。BT Brands 15.6%的股份由公司内部人士持有。相比之下，Sweetgreen 27.5%的股份由公司内部人士持有。强大的机构持股表明，大型基金管理公司、对冲基金和捐赠基金相信，一只股票有望实现长期增长。
Volatility & Risk
波动性与风险
BT Brands has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sweetgreen has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.
BT Brands的贝塔系数为0.4，表明其股价的波动性比标准普尔500指数低60%。相比之下，Sweetgreen的贝塔系数为1.42，这表明其股价的波动性比标准普尔500指数高42%。
Analyst Ratings
分析师评级
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| BT Brands | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Sweetgreen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| 销售评级 | 保持评级 | 购买评级 | 强劲的买入评级 | 评级分数 | |
| 英国电信品牌 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 不适用 |
| 甜心绿 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 不适用 |
Sweetgreen has a consensus target price of 19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 123.79%. Given Sweetgreen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sweetgreen is more favorable than BT Brands.
Sweetgreen的共识目标价为19.00%，暗示潜在上涨123.79%。考虑到Sweetgreen更有可能的上行空间，分析师们显然认为Sweetgreen比BT Brands更有利。
Earnings and Valuation
收益和估值
This table compares BT Brands and Sweetgreen's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
此表比较了BT Brands和Sweetgreen的毛收入、每股收益和估值。
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| BT Brands | $8.45 million | 1.38 | $610,000.00 | ($0.04) | -45.25 |
| Sweetgreen | $339.87 million | 2.77 | -$153.18 million | -2.38 | -3.57 |
| 总收入 | 价格/销售额比 | 净收入 | 每股收益 | 市盈率 | |
| 英国电信品牌 | 845万美元 | 1.38 | $610,000.00 | ($0.04) | -45.25 |
| 甜心绿 | 3.3987亿美元 | 2.77 | -1.5318亿美元 | -2.38 | -3.57 |
BT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sweetgreen. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sweetgreen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
与Sweetgreen相比，BT Brands的收益更高，但收入更低。BT Brands的市盈率低于Sweetgreen，表明它目前是两只股票中更负担得起的一只。
Profitability
盈利能力
This table compares BT Brands and Sweetgreen's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
此表比较了BT Brands和Sweetgreen的净利润率、股本回报率和资产回报率。
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| BT Brands | -1.16% | -1.47% | -1.02% |
| Sweetgreen | -45.27% | -30.98% | -26.19% |
| 净利润率 | 股本回报率 | 资产回报率 | |
| 英国电信品牌 | -1.16% | -1.47% | -1.02% |
| 甜心绿 | -45.27% | -30.98% | -26.19% |
Summary
摘要
Sweetgreen beats BT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
在两只股票比较的12个因素中，Sweetgreen有7个击败了BT Brands。
About BT Brands
关于英国电信品牌
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
BT Brands, Inc. owns and operates fast-food restaurants in the north central region of United States. The company operates nine Burger Time restaurants located in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota; and a Dairy Queen franchise in Ham Lake, Minnesota. Its Burger Time restaurants provide various burgers and other food products, such as chicken sandwiches, pulled pork sandwiches, side dishes, and soft drinks; and Dairy Queen restaurant offers burgers, chicken, sides, ice cream and other desserts, and various beverages. The company was founded in 1987 and is based in West Fargo, North Dakota.
BT Brands，Inc.在美国中北部地区拥有并经营快餐店。该公司在明尼苏达州、北达科他州和南达科他州经营着9家汉堡时间餐厅；在明尼苏达州的哈姆湖经营着一家乳品皇后特许经营权。它的汉堡时间餐厅提供各种汉堡和其他食品，如鸡肉三明治、拉猪肉三明治、配菜和软饮料；乳制品皇后餐厅提供汉堡、鸡肉、配菜、冰淇淋和其他甜点和各种饮料。该公司成立于1987年，总部设在北达科他州的西法戈。
About Sweetgreen
关于Sweetgreen
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
Sweetgreen, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops and operates fast-casual restaurants serving healthy foods prepared from seasonal and organic ingredients. The company also accepts orders through its online and mobile ordering platforms, as well as sells gift cards that can be redeemed in its restaurants. As of September 26, 2021, it owned and operated 140 restaurants in 13 states and Washington, D.C. The company was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
Sweetgreen，Inc.与其子公司一起开发和运营快速休闲餐厅，提供由季节性和有机成分制成的健康食品。该公司还通过其在线和移动订购平台接受订单，并销售可以在其餐厅兑换的礼品卡。截至2021年9月26日，该公司在13个州和华盛顿特区拥有并运营140家餐厅。该公司成立于2006年，总部位于加利福尼亚州洛杉矶。
Receive News & Ratings for BT Brands Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for BT Brands and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
接受英国电信品牌日报的新闻和评级-在下面输入您的电子邮件地址，通过MarketBeat.com的免费每日电子邮件时事通讯接收关于BT Brands和相关公司的最新新闻和分析师评级的每日简明摘要。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国，moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供，一家受美国证券交易委员会（SEC）监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局（FINRA）和证券投资者保护公司（SIPC）的成员。
在新加坡，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供，该公司受新加坡金融管理局（MAS）监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ，持有财务顾问豁免（Exempt Financial Adviser）资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚，moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供，该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构（AFSL No. 224663）。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件，这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大，通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供，并受加拿大投资监管机构（CIRO）监管。
在马来西亚，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供，该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会（SC）监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
风险及免责提示
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国，moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供，一家受美国证券交易委员会（SEC）监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局（FINRA）和证券投资者保护公司（SIPC）的成员。
在新加坡，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供，该公司受新加坡金融管理局（MAS）监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ，持有财务顾问豁免（Exempt Financial Adviser）资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚，moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供，该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构（AFSL No. 224663）。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件，这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大，通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供，并受加拿大投资监管机构（CIRO）监管。
在马来西亚，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供，该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会（SC）监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用浏览器的分享功能，分享给你的好友吧