share_log

An Intrinsic Calculation For Mativ Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:MATV) Suggests It's 43% Undervalued

An Intrinsic Calculation For Mativ Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:MATV) Suggests It's 43% Undervalued

Mativ Holdings, Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:MATV)的内在计算表明其被低估了43%
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/07 08:35

Today we will run through one way of estimating the intrinsic value of Mativ Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:MATV) by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. We will use the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model on this occasion. Believe it or not, it's not too difficult to follow, as you'll see from our example!

今天,我们将介绍一种评估Mativ Holdings,Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:MATV)内在价值的方法,即将公司未来的预测现金流折现为今天的价值。在这种情况下,我们将使用贴现现金流(DCF)模型。信不信由你,遵循它并不太难,正如您将从我们的示例中看到的那样!

We generally believe that a company's value is the present value of all of the cash it will generate in the future. However, a DCF is just one valuation metric among many, and it is not without flaws. For those who are keen learners of equity analysis, the Simply Wall St analysis model here may be something of interest to you.

我们通常认为,一家公司的价值是它未来将产生的所有现金的现值。然而,贴现现金流只是众多估值指标中的一个,它也并非没有缺陷。对于那些热衷于学习股票分析的人来说,这里的Simply Wall St.分析模型可能会让你感兴趣。

See our latest analysis for Mativ Holdings

查看我们对Mativ Holdings的最新分析

The Model

模型

We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.

我们使用所谓的两阶段模型,也就是说,公司的现金流有两个不同的增长率。一般来说,第一阶段是较高增长阶段,第二阶段是较低增长阶段。首先,我们需要估计未来十年的现金流。在可能的情况下,我们使用分析师的估计,但当这些估计不可用时,我们会根据上次估计或报告的价值推断先前的自由现金流(FCF)。我们假设,自由现金流萎缩的公司将减缓收缩速度,而自由现金流增长的公司在这段时间内的增长速度将放缓。我们这样做是为了反映出,增长在最初几年往往比后来几年放缓得更多。

Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:

一般来说,我们假设今天的一美元比未来的一美元更有价值,因此我们需要对这些未来现金流的总和进行贴现,以得出现值估计:

10-year free cash flow (FCF) forecast

10年自由现金流(FCF)预测

2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
Levered FCF ($, Millions) US$143.0m US$181.0m US$203.0m US$219.2m US$232.7m US$244.2m US$254.0m US$262.7m US$270.6m US$277.8m
Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x2 Analyst x1 Analyst x1 Est @ 7.98% Est @ 6.18% Est @ 4.92% Est @ 4.04% Est @ 3.42% Est @ 2.99% Est @ 2.69%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 12% US$128 US$145 US$146 US$141 US$134 US$126 US$118 US$109 US$100 US$92.4
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032
杠杆式FCF(百万美元) 1.430亿美元 1.81亿美元 2.030亿美元 2.192亿美元 2.327亿美元 2.442亿美元 2.540亿美元 2.627亿美元 2.706亿美元 2.778亿美元
增长率预估来源 分析师x2 分析师x1 分析师x1 Est@7.98% Est@6.18% Est@4.92% Est@4.04% Est@3.42% Est@2.99% Est@2.69%
现值(美元,百万)贴现@12% 128美元 145美元 146美元 141美元 134美元 126美元 118美元 109美元 100美元 92.4美元

("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$1.2b

(“EST”=Simply Wall St.预估的FCF成长率)
10年期现金流现值(PVCF)=12亿美元

We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after this ten year period. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 2.0%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 12%.

我们现在需要计算终端价值,它说明了这十年之后的所有未来现金流。戈登增长公式用于计算终端价值,其未来年增长率等于10年期政府债券收益率2.0%的5年平均水平。我们以12%的权益成本将终端现金流贴现到今天的价值。

Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2032 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$278m× (1 + 2.0%) ÷ (12%– 2.0%) = US$2.9b

终端值(TV)=FCF2032×(1+g)?(r-g)=2.78亿美元×(1+2.0%)?(12%-2.0%)=29亿美元

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$2.9b÷ ( 1 + 12%)10= US$976m

终值现值(PVTV)=TV/(1+r)10=29亿美元?(1+12%)10=9.76亿美元

The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$2.2b. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$23.2, the company appears quite undervalued at a 43% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.

那么,总价值或权益价值就是未来现金流的现值之和,在这种情况下,现金流的现值为22亿美元。最后一步是将股权价值除以流通股数量。相对于目前23.2美元的股价,该公司的估值似乎比目前的股价有43%的折让。任何计算中的假设都会对估值产生很大影响,因此最好将其视为粗略估计,而不是精确到最后一分钱。

dcf
NYSE:MATV Discounted Cash Flow January 7th 2023
纽约证券交易所:MATV贴现现金流2023年1月7日

The Assumptions

假设

Now the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate, and of course, the actual cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Mativ Holdings as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 12%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.607. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

现在,贴现现金流最重要的投入是贴现率,当然还有实际现金流。您不必同意这些输入,我建议您自己重新计算并使用它们。DCF也没有考虑一个行业可能的周期性,也没有考虑一家公司未来的资本要求,因此它没有给出一家公司潜在业绩的全貌。鉴于我们将Mativ Holdings视为潜在股东,股权成本被用作贴现率,而不是占债务的资本成本(或加权平均资本成本,WACC)。在这个计算中,我们使用了12%,这是基于杠杆率为1.607的测试版。贝塔系数是衡量一只股票相对于整个市场的波动性的指标。我们的贝塔系数来自全球可比公司的行业平均贝塔系数,强制限制在0.8到2.0之间,这是一个稳定业务的合理范围。

SWOT Analysis for Mativ Holdings

麦提夫控股的SWOT分析

Strength
强度
  • Dividend is in the top 25% of dividend payers in the market.
  • 股息是市场上排名前25%的股息支付者。
  • Dividend information for MATV.
  • MATV的股息信息。
Weakness
软肋
  • Earnings declined over the past year.
  • 在过去的一年里,公司的收益有所下降。
  • Interest payments on debt are not well covered.
  • 债务的利息支付没有得到很好的覆盖。
  • Shareholders have been diluted in the past year.
  • 在过去的一年里,股东被稀释了。
Opportunity
机会
  • Annual earnings are forecast to grow faster than the American market.
  • 预计该公司的年收入增长速度将快于美国市场。
  • Good value based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value.
  • 基于市盈率和估计公允价值的良好价值。
  • Significant insider buying over the past 3 months.
  • 过去3个月的重大内幕收购。
Threat
威胁
  • Debt is not well covered by operating cash flow.
  • 运营现金流无法很好地覆盖债务。
  • Dividends are not covered by earnings.
  • 股息不包括在收益中。
  • Is MATV well equipped to handle threats?
  • MATV是否做好了应对威胁的准备?

Moving On:

下一步:

Although the valuation of a company is important, it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. It's not possible to obtain a foolproof valuation with a DCF model. Instead the best use for a DCF model is to test certain assumptions and theories to see if they would lead to the company being undervalued or overvalued. For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. What is the reason for the share price sitting below the intrinsic value? For Mativ Holdings, there are three additional items you should look at:

尽管一家公司的估值很重要,但它只是你需要对一家公司进行评估的众多因素之一。用贴现现金流模型不可能获得万无一失的估值。相反,贴现现金流模型的最佳用途是测试某些假设和理论,看看它们是否会导致公司被低估或高估。例如,公司权益成本或无风险利率的变化可能会对估值产生重大影响。股价低于内在价值的原因是什么?对于Mativ Holdings,有三个额外的项目你应该看看:

  1. Risks: For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Mativ Holdings (3 make us uncomfortable) you should be aware of.
  2. Future Earnings: How does MATV's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
  3. Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!
  1. 风险:例如,我们已经确定了Mativ Holdings的5个警告信号(3)让我们不舒服)你应该意识到。
  2. 未来收益:与同行和更广泛的市场相比,MATV的增长率如何?通过与我们的免费分析师增长预期图表互动,更深入地挖掘分析师对未来几年的共识数字。
  3. 其他稳固的企业:低债务、高股本回报率和良好的过去业绩是强劲业务的基础。为什么不探索我们具有坚实商业基本面的股票的互动列表,看看是否有其他您可能没有考虑过的公司!

PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the NYSE every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here.

PS.Simply Wall St.应用每天对纽约证交所的每只股票进行现金流贴现估值。如果你想找到其他股票的计算方法,只需搜索此处。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发