share_log

U.S. Silica Holdings (NYSE:SLCA) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

U.S. Silica Holdings (NYSE:SLCA) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

美国硅石控股公司(纽约证券交易所代码:SLCA)在使用债务方面承担了一些风险
Simply Wall St ·  2023/01/05 05:32

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:SLCA) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

传奇基金经理Li·Lu曾说过,最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久性的资本损失。当我们考虑一家公司的风险有多大时,我们总是喜欢看它对债务的使用,因为债务过重可能导致破产。我们可以看到美国硅石控股公司(纽约证券交易所代码:SLCA)确实在其业务中使用债务。但股东是否应该担心它的债务使用情况?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务在什么时候是危险的?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

当一家企业无法轻松履行这些义务时,债务和其他债务就会变得有风险,无论是通过自由现金流还是通过以有吸引力的价格筹集资本。资本主义的一部分是“创造性破坏”的过程,破产的企业被银行家无情地清算。然而,更常见(但代价仍然高昂)的情况是,一家公司必须以极低的价格发行股票,永久性地稀释股东的股份,只是为了支撑其资产负债表。当然,在企业中,债务可以是一个重要的工具,特别是资本密集型企业。当考虑一家企业使用了多少债务时,首先要做的是把现金和债务放在一起看。

See our latest analysis for U.S. Silica Holdings

请参阅我们对美国硅石控股公司的最新分析

What Is U.S. Silica Holdings's Debt?

美国硅石控股公司的债务是什么?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that U.S. Silica Holdings had debt of US$1.11b at the end of September 2022, a reduction from US$1.21b over a year. However, it also had US$267.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$840.7m.

下图(您可以单击查看更多详细信息)显示,截至2022年9月底,美国硅石控股公司的债务为11.1亿美元,低于一年内的12.1亿美元。然而,它也有2.671亿美元的现金,因此它的净债务为8.407亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:SLCA Debt to Equity History January 5th 2023
纽约证券交易所:SLCA债转股历史2023年1月5日

How Healthy Is U.S. Silica Holdings' Balance Sheet?

美国硅石控股公司的资产负债表健康程度如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that U.S. Silica Holdings had liabilities of US$280.4m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.30b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$267.1m in cash and US$236.2m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.08b.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,美国硅石控股公司有2.804亿美元的债务在一年内到期,13.亿美元的债务在一年后到期。作为抵消,它有2.671亿美元的现金和2.362亿美元的应收账款在12个月内到期。因此,其负债比现金和(近期)应收账款之和高出10.8亿美元。

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$893.4m, we think shareholders really should watch U.S. Silica Holdings's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

鉴于这一赤字实际上高于该公司8.934亿美元的市值,我们认为股东们真的应该关注美国硅谷控股公司的债务水平,就像父母第一次看孩子骑车一样。在该公司不得不迅速清理其资产负债表的情况下,股东似乎可能会遭受广泛的稀释。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我们使用两个主要比率来告知我们债务相对于收益的水平。第一个是净债务除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA),第二个是其息税前收益(EBIT)覆盖其利息支出(或简称利息覆盖)的多少倍。这样,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量,也考虑了为其支付的利率。

While U.S. Silica Holdings's debt to EBITDA ratio (3.3) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.5, suggesting high leverage. It seems that the business incurs large depreciation and amortisation charges, so maybe its debt load is heavier than it would first appear, since EBITDA is arguably a generous measure of earnings. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. The good news is that U.S. Silica Holdings grew its EBIT a smooth 79% over the last twelve months. Like a mother's loving embrace of a newborn that sort of growth builds resilience, putting the company in a stronger position to manage its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if U.S. Silica Holdings can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

虽然U.S.Silica Holdings的债务与EBITDA之比(3.3)表明它使用了一些债务,但其利息覆盖率非常弱,为1.5,这表明它的杠杆率很高。这项业务似乎产生了巨额折旧和摊销费用,因此它的债务负担可能比最初看起来更重,因为EBITDA可以说是一项慷慨的收益衡量指标。因此,股东们可能应该意识到,利息支出最近似乎确实对业务产生了影响。好消息是,美国硅石控股公司在过去12个月中息税前利润平稳增长了79%。就像母亲慈爱地拥抱新生儿一样,这种增长增强了公司的韧性,使公司在管理债务方面处于更有利的地位。当你分析债务时,资产负债表显然是你关注的领域。但最终,该业务未来的盈利能力将决定美国硅石控股公司能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。所以,如果你关注未来,你可以看看这个免费显示分析师利润预测的报告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, U.S. Silica Holdings actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

最后,一家公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,我们总是检查EBIT中有多少转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年里,美国硅石控股公司实际上产生了比息税前利润更多的自由现金流。说到赢得贷款人的好感,没有什么比收到的现金更好的了。

Our View

我们的观点

While U.S. Silica Holdings's interest cover has us nervous. To wit both its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and EBIT growth rate were encouraging signs. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that U.S. Silica Holdings is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for U.S. Silica Holdings (1 is potentially serious) you should be aware of.

而美国硅石控股公司的利息担保让我们感到紧张。换句话说,它将息税前利润转换为自由现金流和息税前利润增长率都是令人鼓舞的迹象。从上面提到的所有角度来看,在我们看来,由于美国硅石控股公司的债务,它确实是一项有一定风险的投资。这不一定是一件坏事,因为杠杆可以提高股本回报率,但这是需要注意的。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是一个起点。但归根结底,每家公司都可能包含存在于资产负债表之外的风险。例如,我们已经确定美国硅石控股公司的2个警告信号(%1可能很严重)您应该注意。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果你对一家增长迅速、资产负债表坚如磐石的公司更感兴趣,那么请立即查看我们的净现金成长型股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发