-
市场
-
产品
-
资讯
-
Moo社区
-
课堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介绍
-
费用费用透明，无最低余额限制
投资选择、功能介绍、费用相关信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 浅色
Contrasting Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) & BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD)
Contrasting Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) & BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD)
Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG – Get Rating) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD – Get Rating) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.
Profitability
This table compares Sweetgreen and BT Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Get Sweetgreen alerts:| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Sweetgreen | -45.27% | -30.98% | -26.19% |
| BT Brands | -1.16% | -1.47% | -1.02% |
Risk and Volatility
Sweetgreen has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Institutional and Insider Ownership
84.3% of Sweetgreen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of BT Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 27.5% of Sweetgreen shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of BT Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.Analyst Recommendations
This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sweetgreen and BT Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Sweetgreen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| BT Brands | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Sweetgreen currently has a consensus target price of 19.00, indicating a potential upside of 121.70%. Given Sweetgreen's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sweetgreen is more favorable than BT Brands.
Valuation and Earnings
This table compares Sweetgreen and BT Brands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Sweetgreen | $339.87 million | 2.79 | -$153.18 million | -2.38 | -3.60 |
| BT Brands | $8.45 million | 1.40 | $610,000.00 | ($0.04) | -45.75 |
BT Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sweetgreen. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sweetgreen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Sweetgreen beats BT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Sweetgreen
(Get Rating)
Sweetgreen, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops and operates fast-casual restaurants serving healthy foods prepared from seasonal and organic ingredients. The company also accepts orders through its online and mobile ordering platforms, as well as sells gift cards that can be redeemed in its restaurants. As of September 26, 2021, it owned and operated 140 restaurants in 13 states and Washington, D.C. The company was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
About BT Brands
(Get Rating)
BT Brands, Inc. owns and operates fast-food restaurants in the north central region of United States. The company operates nine Burger Time restaurants located in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota; and a Dairy Queen franchise in Ham Lake, Minnesota. Its Burger Time restaurants provide various burgers and other food products, such as chicken sandwiches, pulled pork sandwiches, side dishes, and soft drinks; and Dairy Queen restaurant offers burgers, chicken, sides, ice cream and other desserts, and various beverages. The company was founded in 1987 and is based in West Fargo, North Dakota.
Receive News & Ratings for Sweetgreen Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Sweetgreen and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG – Get Rating) and BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBD – Get Rating) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.
Sweetgreen(纽约证券交易所代码：SG-GET Rating)和BT Brands(纳斯达克：BTBD-GET Rating)都是小盘零售/批发公司，但哪一家更好？我们将根据这两家公司的机构所有权、估值、分析师建议、盈利能力、股息、收益和风险的实力进行比较。
Profitability
盈利能力
This table compares Sweetgreen and BT Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
下表比较了Sweetgreen和BT Brands的净利润率、股本回报率和资产回报率。
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Sweetgreen | -45.27% | -30.98% | -26.19% |
| BT Brands | -1.16% | -1.47% | -1.02% |
| 净利润率 | 股本回报率 | 资产回报率 | |
| 甜心绿 | -45.27% | -30.98% | -26.19% |
| 英国电信品牌 | -1.16% | -1.47% | -1.02% |
Risk and Volatility
风险和波动性
Sweetgreen has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BT Brands has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Sweetgreen的贝塔系数为1.43，这表明其股价的波动性比标准普尔500指数高43%。相比之下，BT Brands的贝塔系数为0.4，这表明其股价的波动性比标准普尔500指数低60%。
Institutional and Insider Ownership
机构和内部人持股
Analyst Recommendations
分析师建议
This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sweetgreen and BT Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
这是由MarketBeat.com提供的Sweetgreen和BT Brands最近的评级和推荐细目。
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Sweetgreen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| BT Brands | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| 销售评级 | 保持评级 | 购买评级 | 强劲的买入评级 | 评级分数 | |
| 甜心绿 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 不适用 |
| 英国电信品牌 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 不适用 |
Sweetgreen currently has a consensus target price of 19.00, indicating a potential upside of 121.70%. Given Sweetgreen's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sweetgreen is more favorable than BT Brands.
Sweetgreen目前的共识目标价为19.00，表明潜在上行空间为121.70%。考虑到Sweetgreen更有可能的上行空间，股票分析师显然认为Sweetgreen比BT Brands更有利。
Valuation and Earnings
估值和收益
This table compares Sweetgreen and BT Brands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
该表格比较了Sweetgreen和BT Brands的营收、每股收益(EPS)和估值。
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Sweetgreen | $339.87 million | 2.79 | -$153.18 million | -2.38 | -3.60 |
| BT Brands | $8.45 million | 1.40 | $610,000.00 | ($0.04) | -45.75 |
| 总收入 | 价格/销售额比 | 净收入 | 每股收益 | 市盈率 | |
| 甜心绿 | 3.3987亿美元 | 2.79 | -1.5318亿美元 | -2.38 | -3.60 |
| 英国电信品牌 | 845万美元 | 1.40 | $610,000.00 | ($0.04) | -45.75 |
BT Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sweetgreen. BT Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sweetgreen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
BT Brands的收入低于Sweetgreen，但收益高于Sweetgreen。BT Brands的市盈率低于Sweetgreen，表明它目前是两只股票中更负担得起的一只。
Summary
摘要
Sweetgreen beats BT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
在两只股票比较的12个因素中，Sweetgreen有7个击败了BT Brands。
About Sweetgreen
关于Sweetgreen
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
Sweetgreen, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, develops and operates fast-casual restaurants serving healthy foods prepared from seasonal and organic ingredients. The company also accepts orders through its online and mobile ordering platforms, as well as sells gift cards that can be redeemed in its restaurants. As of September 26, 2021, it owned and operated 140 restaurants in 13 states and Washington, D.C. The company was founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
Sweetgreen，Inc.与其子公司一起开发和运营快速休闲餐厅，提供由季节性和有机成分制成的健康食品。该公司还通过其在线和移动订购平台接受订单，并销售可以在其餐厅兑换的礼品卡。截至2021年9月26日，该公司在13个州和华盛顿特区拥有并运营140家餐厅。该公司成立于2006年，总部位于加利福尼亚州洛杉矶。
About BT Brands
关于英国电信品牌
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
BT Brands, Inc. owns and operates fast-food restaurants in the north central region of United States. The company operates nine Burger Time restaurants located in Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota; and a Dairy Queen franchise in Ham Lake, Minnesota. Its Burger Time restaurants provide various burgers and other food products, such as chicken sandwiches, pulled pork sandwiches, side dishes, and soft drinks; and Dairy Queen restaurant offers burgers, chicken, sides, ice cream and other desserts, and various beverages. The company was founded in 1987 and is based in West Fargo, North Dakota.
BT Brands，Inc.在美国中北部地区拥有并经营快餐店。该公司在明尼苏达州、北达科他州和南达科他州经营着9家汉堡时间餐厅；在明尼苏达州的哈姆湖经营着一家乳品皇后特许经营权。它的汉堡时间餐厅提供各种汉堡和其他食品，如鸡肉三明治、拉猪肉三明治、配菜和软饮料；乳制品皇后餐厅提供汉堡、鸡肉、配菜、冰淇淋和其他甜点和各种饮料。该公司成立于1987年，总部设在北达科他州的西法戈。
Receive News & Ratings for Sweetgreen Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Sweetgreen and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
接受《Sweetgreen Daily》的新闻和评级-在下面输入您的电子邮件地址，通过MarketBeat.com的免费每日电子邮件时事通讯接收对Sweetgreen和相关公司的最新新闻和分析师评级的每日简要摘要。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国，moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供，一家受美国证券交易委员会（SEC）监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局（FINRA）和证券投资者保护公司（SIPC）的成员。
在新加坡，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供，该公司受新加坡金融管理局（MAS）监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ，持有财务顾问豁免（Exempt Financial Adviser）资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚，moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供，该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构（AFSL No. 224663）。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件，这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大，通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供，并受加拿大投资监管机构（CIRO）监管。
在马来西亚，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供，该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会（SC）监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
风险及免责提示
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国，moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供，一家受美国证券交易委员会（SEC）监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局（FINRA）和证券投资者保护公司（SIPC）的成员。
在新加坡，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供，该公司受新加坡金融管理局（MAS）监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ，持有财务顾问豁免（Exempt Financial Adviser）资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚，moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供，该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构（AFSL No. 224663）。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件，这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大，通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供，并受加拿大投资监管机构（CIRO）监管。
在马来西亚，moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供，该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会（SC）监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ，持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用浏览器的分享功能，分享给你的好友吧