-
市场
-
产品
-
资讯
-
Moo社区
-
课堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介绍
-
费用费用透明,无最低余额限制
投资选择、功能介绍、费用相关信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 浅色
Singapore Technologies Engineering (SGX:S63) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Singapore Technologies Engineering (SGX:S63) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd (SGX:S63) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
Check out our latest analysis for Singapore Technologies Engineering
What Is Singapore Technologies Engineering's Net Debt?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2022 Singapore Technologies Engineering had S$6.17b of debt, an increase on S$2.03b, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of S$533.3m, its net debt is less, at about S$5.64b.
SGX:S63 Debt to Equity History December 19th 2022How Strong Is Singapore Technologies Engineering's Balance Sheet?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Singapore Technologies Engineering had liabilities of S$7.52b falling due within a year, and liabilities of S$4.52b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of S$533.3m and S$3.23b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by S$8.28b.
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of S$10.5b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Singapore Technologies Engineering's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
Strangely Singapore Technologies Engineering has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 5.6, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 11.3. This means that unless the company has access to very cheap debt, that interest expense will likely grow in the future. Notably Singapore Technologies Engineering's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year. Ideally it can diminish its debt load by kick-starting earnings growth. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Singapore Technologies Engineering's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, Singapore Technologies Engineering generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 85% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.
Our View
Both Singapore Technologies Engineering's ability to to convert EBIT to free cash flow and its interest cover gave us comfort that it can handle its debt. But truth be told its net debt to EBITDA had us nibbling our nails. Looking at all this data makes us feel a little cautious about Singapore Technologies Engineering's debt levels. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Singapore Technologies Engineering that you should be aware of before investing here.
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
传奇基金经理Li·Lu曾说过,最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久性的资本损失。因此,当你评估一家公司的风险有多大时,聪明的投资者似乎知道债务--通常涉及破产--是一个非常重要的因素。我们注意到新加坡科技工程有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:S63)的资产负债表上确实有债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务造成了多大的风险?
债务会带来什么风险?
债务帮助企业,直到企业难以偿还债务,无论是用新资本还是用自由现金流。如果情况真的变得很糟糕,贷款人可以控制业务。然而,一种更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,一家公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东的股份,才能控制债务。当然,债务的好处是,它往往代表着廉价资本,特别是当它用能够以高回报率进行再投资的能力取代公司的稀释时。当我们检查债务水平时,我们首先同时考虑现金和债务水平。
查看我们对新加坡技术工程公司的最新分析
新加坡科技工程公司的净债务是多少?
您可以点击下图查看历史数字,但它显示,截至2022年6月,新加坡技术工程公司的债务为61.7亿新元,比一年前增加了20.3亿新元。然而,由于该公司拥有5.33亿新元的现金储备,其净债务较少,约为56.4亿新元。
新交所:S63债转股历史2022年12月19日新加坡科技工程公司的资产负债表有多强劲?
我们可以从最近的资产负债表中看到,新加坡科技工程公司有75.2亿新加坡元的负债在一年内到期,还有45.2亿新加坡元的负债在一年内到期。另一方面,该公司有5.33亿新元的现金和价值32.3亿新元的应收账款在一年内到期。因此,它的负债比现金和(近期)应收账款之和高出82.8亿新元。
与其105亿新元的市值相比,这一赤字是相当可观的,因此它确实表明,股东应该密切关注新加坡科技工程公司的债务使用情况。这表明,如果该公司需要匆忙支撑其资产负债表,股东将被严重稀释。
为了评估一家公司的债务相对于它的收益,我们计算它的净债务除以它的利息、税项、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)和它的利息和税前收益(EBIT)除以它的利息支出(它的利息覆盖)。这样,我们既考虑了债务的绝对量,也考虑了为其支付的利率。
奇怪的是,新加坡科技工程公司的EBITDA比率高达5.6,这意味着债务很高,但利息覆盖率高达11.3。这意味着,除非该公司能够获得非常廉价的债务,否则未来的利息支出可能会增加。值得注意的是,新加坡科技工程公司去年的息税前利润基本持平。理想情况下,它可以通过启动盈利增长来减轻债务负担。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到的债务最多。但最重要的是,未来的收益将决定新加坡科技工程公司未来能否保持健康的资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。
最后,一家公司只能用冷硬现金偿还债务,而不是会计利润。因此,有必要检查这笔息税前利润中有多少是由自由现金流支持的。在过去的三年中,新加坡科技工程公司产生了相当强劲的自由现金流,占其息税前利润的85%,超出了我们的预期。这使其在偿还债务方面处于非常有利的地位。
我们的观点
新加坡科技工程公司将息税前利润转换为自由现金流的能力和利息覆盖率都让我们感到欣慰,因为它可以处理债务。但说实话,它对EBITDA的净债务让我们咬紧牙关。看着所有这些数据,我们对新加坡科技工程公司的债务水平感到有点谨慎。虽然我们认识到债务可以提高股本回报率,但我们建议股东密切关注其债务水平,以免增加。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到的债务最多。然而,并非所有投资风险都存在于资产负债表中--远非如此。例如,我们发现新加坡技术工程公司的2个警告标志在这里投资之前你应该意识到这一点。
当然,如果你是那种喜欢在没有债务负担的情况下购买股票的投资者,那么不要犹豫,今天就来看看我们的净现金成长型股票独家名单。
对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国,moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美国证券交易委员会(SEC)监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局(FINRA)和证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)的成员。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,该公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ,持有财务顾问豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚,moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构(AFSL No. 224663)。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件,这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大,通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,并受加拿大投资监管机构(CIRO)监管。
在马来西亚,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会(SC)监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
风险及免责提示
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国,moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美国证券交易委员会(SEC)监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局(FINRA)和证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)的成员。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,该公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ,持有财务顾问豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚,moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构(AFSL No. 224663)。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件,这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大,通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,并受加拿大投资监管机构(CIRO)监管。
在马来西亚,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会(SC)监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用浏览器的分享功能,分享给你的好友吧