-
市场
-
产品
-
资讯
-
Moo社区
-
课堂
-
查看更多
-
功能介绍
-
费用费用透明,无最低余额限制
投资选择、功能介绍、费用相关信息由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供
- English
- 中文繁體
- 中文简体
- 深色
- 浅色
United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) Vs. Root (NASDAQ:ROOT) Head-To-Head Contrast
United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) Vs. Root (NASDAQ:ROOT) Head-To-Head Contrast
Root (NASDAQ:ROOT – Get Rating) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS – Get Rating) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and risk.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares Root and United Fire Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
Get Root alerts:Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
Root | $345.40 million | 0.45 | -$521.10 million | ($29.32) | -0.38 |
United Fire Group | $1.07 billion | 0.70 | $80.59 million | $2.60 | 11.40 |
United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Root. Root is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Volatility & Risk
Root has a beta of 0.03, indicating that its stock price is 97% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the S&P 500.Institutional and Insider Ownership
65.3% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 27.6% of Root shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Analyst Recommendations
This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Root and United Fire Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
Root | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.80 |
United Fire Group | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
Root presently has a consensus target price of $23.29, suggesting a potential upside of 111.73%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.83%. Given Root's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Root is more favorable than United Fire Group.
Profitability
This table compares Root and United Fire Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
Root | -115.99% | -80.67% | -27.81% |
United Fire Group | 6.70% | 8.41% | 2.35% |
Summary
United Fire Group beats Root on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Root
(Get Rating)
Root, Inc. provides insurance products and services in the United States. The company offers automobile, homeowners, and renters insurance products. The company operates a direct-to-consumer model and serves customers primarily through mobile applications, as well as through its website. Its direct distribution channels also cover digital, media, and referral channels, as well as distribution partners and agencies. The company was incorporated in 2015 and is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.
About United Fire Group
(Get Rating)
United Fire Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides property and casualty insurance for individuals and businesses in the United States. The company offers commercial and personal lines of property and casualty insurance; and commercial multiple peril and inland marine insurance, as well as assumed reinsurance products. Its commercial policies include fire and allied lines, other liability, automobile, workers' compensation, and fidelity and surety coverage; and personal lines comprise automobile, and fire and allied lines coverage, including homeowners. The company sells its products through a network of independent agencies. United Fire Group, Inc. was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Receive News & Ratings for Root Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Root and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Root (NASDAQ:ROOT – Get Rating) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS – Get Rating) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and risk.
根(纳斯达克:ROOT-GET)和联火集团(纳斯达克:UFCS-GET)都是小盘股,但哪只是优势股?我们将根据分析师的建议、股息、估值、机构所有权、收益、盈利能力和风险对这两家公司进行比较。
Earnings and Valuation
收益和估值
This table compares Root and United Fire Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
下表比较了Root和United Fire Group的毛收入、每股收益和估值。
Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
Root | $345.40 million | 0.45 | -$521.10 million | ($29.32) | -0.38 |
United Fire Group | $1.07 billion | 0.70 | $80.59 million | $2.60 | 11.40 |
总收入 | 价格/销售额比 | 净收入 | 每股收益 | 市盈率 | |
根部 | 3.54亿美元 | 0.45 | -5.21亿美元 | ($29.32) | -0.38 |
联合消防集团 | 10.7亿美元 | 0.70 | 8059万美元 | $2.60 | 11.40 |
United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Root. Root is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
联合消防集团的收入和收益比Root更高。Root的市盈率低于联合消防集团,这表明它目前是两只股票中更负担得起的一只。
Volatility & Risk
波动性与风险
Institutional and Insider Ownership
机构和内部人持股
65.3% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 27.6% of Root shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
联合消防集团65.3%的股份由机构投资者持有。Root公司27.6%的股份由内部人士持有。相比之下,联合消防集团5.7%的股份由内部人士持有。强大的机构持股表明,捐赠基金、对冲基金和大型基金管理公司相信,一家公司的长期表现将好于大盘。
Analyst Recommendations
分析师建议
This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Root and United Fire Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
这是由MarketBeat.com提供的Root和United Fire Group最近的建议和目标价的摘要。
Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
Root | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.80 |
United Fire Group | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
销售评级 | 保持评级 | 购买评级 | 强劲的买入评级 | 评级分数 | |
根部 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.80 |
联合消防集团 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
Root presently has a consensus target price of $23.29, suggesting a potential upside of 111.73%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $37.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.83%. Given Root's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Root is more favorable than United Fire Group.
Root目前的共识目标价为23.29美元,暗示潜在上涨111.73%。联合消防集团的共识目标价为37.00美元,暗示潜在上涨24.83%。鉴于Root的上行可能性更高,股票分析师显然认为Root比United Fire Group更有利。
Profitability
盈利能力
This table compares Root and United Fire Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
下表比较了Root和United Fire Group的净利润率、股本回报率和资产回报率。
Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
Root | -115.99% | -80.67% | -27.81% |
United Fire Group | 6.70% | 8.41% | 2.35% |
净利润率 | 股本回报率 | 资产回报率 | |
根部 | -115.99% | -80.67% | -27.81% |
联合消防集团 | 6.70% | 8.41% | 2.35% |
Summary
摘要
United Fire Group beats Root on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
联合消防集团在两只股票比较的14个因素中有12个击败了Root。
About Root
关于根
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
Root, Inc. provides insurance products and services in the United States. The company offers automobile, homeowners, and renters insurance products. The company operates a direct-to-consumer model and serves customers primarily through mobile applications, as well as through its website. Its direct distribution channels also cover digital, media, and referral channels, as well as distribution partners and agencies. The company was incorporated in 2015 and is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.
Root,Inc.在美国提供保险产品和服务。该公司提供汽车、房主和租户保险产品。该公司采用直接面向消费者的模式,主要通过移动应用程序以及其网站为客户提供服务。其直接分销渠道还涵盖数字、媒体和推荐渠道,以及分销合作伙伴和机构。该公司成立于2015年,总部位于俄亥俄州哥伦布市。
About United Fire Group
关于联合消防集团
(Get Rating)
(获取评级)
United Fire Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides property and casualty insurance for individuals and businesses in the United States. The company offers commercial and personal lines of property and casualty insurance; and commercial multiple peril and inland marine insurance, as well as assumed reinsurance products. Its commercial policies include fire and allied lines, other liability, automobile, workers' compensation, and fidelity and surety coverage; and personal lines comprise automobile, and fire and allied lines coverage, including homeowners. The company sells its products through a network of independent agencies. United Fire Group, Inc. was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
联合消防集团及其子公司为美国的个人和企业提供财产和意外伤害保险。该公司提供商业和个人财产和意外伤害保险,以及商业多重保险和内陆海上保险,以及假定的再保险产品。它的商业保单包括火灾和相关保险、其他责任、汽车、工人补偿、保真和担保保险;个人保险包括汽车、火灾和相关保险,包括房主。该公司通过一个由独立机构组成的网络销售产品。联合消防集团成立于1946年,总部设在爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹。
Receive News & Ratings for Root Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Root and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
接受《根日报》的新闻和评级-在下面输入您的电子邮件地址,通过MarketBeat.com的免费每日电子邮件时事通讯接收对Root和相关公司的最新新闻和分析师评级的每日简要摘要。
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国,moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美国证券交易委员会(SEC)监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局(FINRA)和证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)的成员。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,该公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ,持有财务顾问豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚,moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构(AFSL No. 224663)。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件,这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大,通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,并受加拿大投资监管机构(CIRO)监管。
在马来西亚,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会(SC)监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
风险及免责提示
moomoo是Moomoo Technologies Inc.公司提供的金融信息和交易应用程序。
在美国,moomoo上的投资产品和服务由Moomoo Financial Inc.提供,一家受美国证券交易委员会(SEC)监管的持牌主体。 Moomoo Financial Inc.是金融业监管局(FINRA)和证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)的成员。
在新加坡,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd.提供,该公司受新加坡金融管理局(MAS)监管(牌照号码︰CMS101000) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMS) ,持有财务顾问豁免(Exempt Financial Adviser)资质。本内容未经新加坡金融管理局的审查。
在澳大利亚,moomoo上的金融产品和服务是通过Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd提供,该公司是受澳大利亚证券和投资委员会(ASIC)监管的澳大利亚金融服务许可机构(AFSL No. 224663)。请阅读并理解我们的《金融服务指南》、《条款与条件》、《隐私政策》和其他披露文件,这些文件可在我们的网站 https://www.moomoo.com/au中获取。
在加拿大,通过moomoo应用提供的仅限订单执行的券商服务由Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.提供,并受加拿大投资监管机构(CIRO)监管。
在马来西亚,moomoo上的投资产品和服务是通过Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 提供,该公司受马来西亚证券监督委员会(SC)监管(牌照号码︰eCMSL/A0397/2024) ,持有资本市场服务牌照 (CMSL) 。本内容未经马来西亚证券监督委员会的审查。
Moomoo Technologies Inc., Moomoo Financial Inc., Moomoo Financial Singapore Pte. Ltd., Futu Securities (Australia) Ltd, Moomoo Financial Canada Inc.,和Moomoo Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.是关联公司。
- 分享到weixin
- 分享到qq
- 分享到facebook
- 分享到twitter
- 分享到微博
- 粘贴板
使用浏览器的分享功能,分享给你的好友吧