share_log

How Many SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) Shares Do Institutions Own?

How Many SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) Shares Do Institutions Own?

机构持有多少股SATS Ltd.(SGX:S58)股票?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/29 20:30

Every investor in SATS Ltd. (SGX:S58) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

SATS有限公司(SGX:S58)的每一位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。大公司通常有机构作为股东,我们通常会看到内部人士持有小公司的股份。过去属于公众所有的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股比例。

SATS has a market capitalization of S$4.4b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SATS.

Sts的市值为44亿新元,因此它太大了,不能低调运行。我们预计,机构投资者和散户投资者都将拥有该公司的部分股权。看看我们关于所有权集团的数据(如下所示),似乎是机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们什么关于SATS的信息。

See our latest analysis for SATS

查看我们对SATS的最新分析

SGX:S58 Ownership Breakdown June 30th 2022
新交所:S58所有权明细2022年6月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SATS?

关于SATS,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,以基准来衡量自己,因此一旦一只股票被纳入主要指数,它们往往会对这只股票变得更加热情。我们预计,大多数公司都会有一些机构登记在册,特别是在它们正在增长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SATS. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SATS' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在SATS中拥有相当多的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到SATS的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

SGX:S58 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 30th 2022
新交所:S58收益和收入增长2022年6月30日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SATS. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited with 40% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.7% and 1.9% of the stock.

对冲基金在SATS中持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据可以看到,最大的股东是淡马锡控股(私人)有限公司,持有40%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东分别持有约3.7%和1.9%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们做了更多的挖掘,发现大股东中有8个约占登记的50%,这意味着除了大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有相当数量的分析师追踪该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of SATS

SATS的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of SATS Ltd. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$41m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据显示,内部人士以自己的名义持有SATS有限公司不到1%的股份。它是一家大公司,所以即使是很小的比例权益也可以在董事会和股东之间建立联盟。在这种情况下,内部人士持有价值4100万新元的股票。看到董事会成员持有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司43%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 40%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

拥有40%股权的私募股权公司有能力在塑造专注于价值创造的公司战略方面发挥作用。有时我们会看到私募股权投资长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且--顾名思义--不会对上市公司进行太多投资。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售并将资本重新配置到其他地方。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for SATS that you should be aware of before investing here.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们发现1个SATS警告标志在这里投资之前你应该意识到这一点。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费分析师对该公司的预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发