share_log

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited (HKG:8170) Shares?

What Type Of Shareholders Own The Most Number of China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited (HKG:8170) Shares?

哪种类型的股东持有中国全国国际控股集团有限公司(HKG:8170)的股份最多?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/29 19:45

A look at the shareholders of China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited (HKG:8170) can tell us which group is most powerful. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

看看中国万国国际控股集团有限公司(HKG:8170)的股东,我们就知道哪个集团最有权势。内部人士通常持有大量较年轻、规模较小的公司,而大公司往往有机构作为股东。我非常希望看到至少有一点内部人持股。正如查理·芒格所说,给我看激励措施,我就会告诉你结果。

With a market capitalization of HK$1.3b, China All Nation International Holdings Group is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are not on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about China All Nation International Holdings Group.

中国万国国际控股集团市值13亿港元,是一只小盘股,因此可能不为许多机构投资者所熟知。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到,机构不在股票登记处。让我们更深入地研究每种类型的所有者,以更多地了解中国全民国际控股集团。

Check out our latest analysis for China All Nation International Holdings Group

查看我们对中国万国国际控股集团的最新分析

SEHK:8170 Ownership Breakdown June 29th 2022
联交所:8170所有权明细2022年6月29日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China All Nation International Holdings Group?

机构所有权的缺失告诉了我们关于中国万国国际控股集团的什么信息?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司往往缺乏机构投资者,但大公司没有机构投资者的情况较少。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of China All Nation International Holdings Group, for yourself, below.

对于机构为何不持有股票,有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理下的资金,该公司规模太小,因此该机构不会费心密切关注该公司。另一方面,专业投资者总是可能会避开一家公司,因为他们认为这不是他们投资的最佳地方。机构投资者可能不会觉得这项业务的历史性增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。你可以在下面看到中国全邦国际控股集团过去的收入表现。

SEHK:8170 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 29th 2022
联交所:8170盈利及收入增长2022年6月29日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in China All Nation International Holdings Group. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In China All Nation International Holdings Group's case, its Top Key Executive, Ye Lin, is the largest shareholder, holding 28% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 13% by the third-largest shareholder.

对冲基金在中国万国国际控股集团的股份并不多。由于行动胜于雄辩,我们认为,当内部人士持有一家公司的大量股份时,这是一个好迹象。在中国万国国际控股集团的案例中,其最高管理层叶林是最大股东,持有28%的流通股。作为参考,第二大股东持有约15%的流通股,第三大股东持有13%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现,前3名股东合计控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有相当大的权力来影响公司的决策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股可以增加你的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解一只股票的预期表现也是一个很好的做法。我们的信息显示,分析师没有对该股进行任何报道,因此它可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of China All Nation International Holdings Group

中国全国国际控股集团的内部人所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人的定义可能是主观的,而且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个别内部人士,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

It seems that insiders own more than half the China All Nation International Holdings Group Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a HK$1.1b stake in this HK$1.3b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看来,内部人士持有中国全邦国际控股集团有限公司一半以上的股份。这给了他们很大的权力。因此,他们在这项13亿港元的业务中持有11亿港元的股份。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望发现(免费)如果他们一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over China All Nation International Holdings Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

持有20%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对中国万国国际控股集团有一定程度的影响力。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand China All Nation International Holdings Group better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with China All Nation International Holdings Group (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但要更好地了解中国全邦国际控股集团,我们还需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该了解2个警告标志我们已经发现了中国万国国际控股集团(包括1家不太受我们欢迎的公司)。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更愿意看看另一家公司--一家财务状况可能更好的公司--那么不要错过这一点免费令人感兴趣的公司名单,有强劲的财务数据支持。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发