share_log

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In The Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels, Limited (HKG:45)?

Do Insiders Own Lots Of Shares In The Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels, Limited (HKG:45)?

内部人士是否持有香港上海酒店有限公司(HKG:45)的大量股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/20 00:40

Every investor in The Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels, Limited (HKG:45) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

香港上海酒店集团有限公司(HKG:45)的每一位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。一般来说,随着公司的成长,机构会增加他们的持股。相反,随着时间的推移,内部人士往往会减少他们的持股。我通常喜欢看到一定程度的内部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如纳西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所说,不要告诉我你的想法,告诉我你的投资组合中有什么。

Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels has a market capitalization of HK$11b, so we would expect some institutional investors to have noticed the stock. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels.

香港上海酒店的市值为110亿港元,因此我们预计一些机构投资者已经注意到了这只股票。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构拥有该公司的股份。我们可以放大不同的所有权集团,了解更多关于香港和上海酒店的信息。

View our latest analysis for Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels

查看我们对香港和上海酒店的最新分析

SEHK:45 Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2022
联交所:45所有权分类2022年6月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels?

关于香港和上海的酒店,机构持股告诉了我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

香港上海酒店已经在股份登记处登记了机构。事实上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,有必要看看香港和上海酒店过去的盈利轨迹(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

SEHK:45 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2022
联交所:45盈利及收入增长2022年6月20日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels. Michael David Kadoorie is currently the largest shareholder, with 51% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 16% and 5.1% of the stock.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对香港和上海酒店进行有意义的投资。Michael David Kadoorie目前是最大股东,持有51%的流通股。由于拥有如此巨大的股权,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。相比之下,第二大股东和第三大股东分别持有约16%和5.1%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股可以增加你的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解一只股票的预期表现也是一个很好的做法。目前,我们没有注意到分析师对该股的报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels

香港和上海酒店的内部人所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of The Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels, Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$11b, that means insiders have a whopping HK$6.5b worth of shares in their own names. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息显示,内部人士拥有香港上海酒店有限公司一半以上的股份。这让他们有效地控制了公司。鉴于其市值为110亿港元,这意味着内部人士以自己的名义持有价值高达65亿港元的股票。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。你可能想知道他们是一直在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有21%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对香港和上海的酒店有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 5.1% of the Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我们可以看到,上市公司持有香港和上海酒店5.1%的已发行股份。这可能是一种战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。这可能是因为它们已经解体。这一持股可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Hongkong and Shanghai Hotels that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定香港和上海酒店的1个警告标志这一点你应该知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我们的免费一组有趣的潜在客户,拥有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发