share_log

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Foryou Corporation (SZSE:002906)?

What Kind Of Investors Own Most Of Foryou Corporation (SZSE:002906)?

For You Corporation(SZSE:002906)持股最多的是哪类投资者?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/10 19:51

A look at the shareholders of Foryou Corporation (SZSE:002906) can tell us which group is most powerful. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.

看看福佑股份有限公司(SZSE:002906)的股东,我们就知道哪个集团最有权势。内部人士通常持有大量较年轻、规模较小的公司,而大公司往往有机构作为股东。过去属于公众所有的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股比例。

Foryou is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of CN¥22b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Foryou.

For You是一家相当大的公司。其市值为人民币220亿元。通常情况下,机构会持有如此规模的公司的很大一部分股份。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能为您提供什么信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Foryou

请查看我们为您进行的最新分析

SZSE:002906 Ownership Breakdown June 10th 2022
深交所:002906股权明细2022年6月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Foryou?

机构所有权告诉我们关于你的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,以基准来衡量自己,因此一旦一只股票被纳入主要指数,它们往往会对这只股票变得更加热情。我们预计,大多数公司都会有一些机构登记在册,特别是在它们正在增长的情况下。

We can see that Foryou does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Foryou's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,因为你确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到你的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

SZSE:002906 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 10th 2022
深圳证交所:002906收益和收入增长2022年6月10日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Foryou is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Huizhou Huayang Investment Co., Ltd., with ownership of 57%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

投资者应该注意到,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使重大权力。For You并不属于对冲基金。该公司第一大股东为惠州华阳投资有限公司,持股57%。由于拥有如此巨大的股权,我们推断他们对公司的未来拥有重大控制权。作为参考,第二大股东持有约12%的流通股,第三大股东持有1.2%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师追踪该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of Foryou

For You的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们注意到,我们的数据没有显示任何董事会成员个人持有股份。董事会成员至少没有一些个人持股是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。下一步很好的做法是检查CEO的薪酬。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Foryou. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有22%的股份,普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对你有一定程度的影响力。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Foryou board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司持有12%的股份,可能会影响Foryou董事会。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为私人股本有时能够鼓励有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。或者,这些持有者可能会在投资上市后退出。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Foryou you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,考虑一下风险。每家公司都有它们,我们已经发现一个给你的警告标志你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发