share_log

Could The Zhongjie (Jiangsu) Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301072) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Could The Zhongjie (Jiangsu) Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301072) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

中捷(江苏)科技股份有限公司(SZSE:301072)的股权结构能告诉我们一些有用的东西吗?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/09 20:12

The big shareholder groups in Zhongjie (Jiangsu) Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301072) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

中捷(江苏)科技有限公司(深交所股票代码:301072)的大股东集团对公司拥有控制权。内部人士通常持有大量较年轻、规模较小的公司,而大公司往往有机构作为股东。我非常希望看到至少有一点内部人持股。正如查理·芒格所说,给我看激励措施,我就会告诉你结果。

Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of CN¥3.4b, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd.

按照全球标准,中捷(江苏)科技有限公司并不是一家大公司。它的市值为人民币34亿元,这意味着它不会受到许多机构投资者的关注。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构拥有该公司的股份。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对中杰(江苏)科技有限公司有什么启示。

Check out our latest analysis for Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd

查看我们对中捷(江苏)科技有限公司的最新分析

SZSE:301072 Ownership Breakdown June 9th 2022
深交所:301072所有权明细2022年6月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd?

关于中捷(江苏)科技有限公司,机构持股告诉了我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,以基准来衡量自己,因此一旦一只股票被纳入主要指数,它们往往会对这只股票变得更加热情。我们预计,大多数公司都会有一些机构登记在册,特别是在它们正在增长的情况下。

Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

中捷(江苏)科技有限公司已有股份登记机构。事实上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到中杰(江苏)科技有限公司的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多的故事。

SZSE:301072 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 9th 2022
深圳证交所:301072收益和收入增长2022年6月9日

Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Heliang Wei with 24% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 23% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 11% by the third-largest shareholder. Zhong Wei, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Senior Key Executive.

中捷(江苏)科技有限公司不属于对冲基金所有。查看我们的数据可以看到,第一大股东是和良卫,持有24%的流通股。作为参考,第二大股东持有约23%的流通股,第三大股东持有11%的股份。作为第二大股东的钟伟,也恰好持有高级关键高管的头衔。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了让我们的研究更有趣,我们发现,前三名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司的报道,所以它很可能在雷达下飞行。

Insider Ownership Of Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd

中捷(江苏)科技有限公司内部人持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zhongjie (Jiangsu) Technology Co.,Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.6b stake in this CN¥3.4b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

内部人士似乎持有中捷(江苏)科技有限公司相当大的比例。业内人士在这笔34亿元的交易中持有16亿元的股份。我们会说,这表明了与股东的一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍相当小;一些内部人士可能创建了这家企业。你可以点击这里,看看这些内部人士是一直在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有26%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对中杰(江苏)科技有限公司有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 17%, private equity firms could influence the Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股权公司持有17%的股份,可能会影响中杰(江苏)科技有限公司董事会。有时我们会看到私募股权投资长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且--顾名思义--不会对上市公司进行太多投资。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售并将资本重新配置到其他地方。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Zhongjie (Jiangsu) TechnologyLtd (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们发现中捷(江苏)科技有限公司的3个警告标志(1有点令人不快!)在这里投资之前你应该意识到这一点。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。所以让我们来看看这个免费 免费有趣的公司名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发