share_log

Do Institutions Own ASM Pacific Technology Limited (HKG:522) Shares?

Do Institutions Own ASM Pacific Technology Limited (HKG:522) Shares?

机构是否拥有ASM太平洋科技有限公司(HKG:522)的股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/06/04 21:00

The big shareholder groups in ASM Pacific Technology Limited (HKG:522) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

ASM太平洋科技有限公司(HKG:522)的大股东集团拥有对公司的控制权。机构通常持有较成熟公司的股票,而内部人士拥有相当一部分较小公司的情况并不少见。已经私有化的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股。

With a market capitalization of HK$29b, ASM Pacific Technology is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about ASM Pacific Technology.

市值290亿港元的ASM太平洋科技相当庞大。我们预计会在登记簿上看到机构投资者。这种规模的公司通常也为散户投资者所熟知。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。我们可以放大不同的所有权组,以了解有关ASM Pacific Technology的更多信息。

See our latest analysis for ASM Pacific Technology

查看我们对ASM太平洋技术的最新分析

SEHK:522 Ownership Breakdown June 5th 2022
联交所:522拥有权分类2022年6月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ASM Pacific Technology?

机构所有权告诉我们关于ASM太平洋技术公司的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

ASM Pacific Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ASM Pacific Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

ASM太平洋技术公司已经在股票登记处登记了机构。事实上,他们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,下面的ASM太平洋科技公司的盈利历史值得一看。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

SEHK:522 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 5th 2022
联交所:522盈利及收入增长2022年6月5日

ASM Pacific Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is ASM International NV with 25% of shares outstanding. Fidelity International Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Schroder Investment Management (Singapore) Ltd holds about 4.4% of the company stock.

ASM太平洋科技并非由对冲基金所有。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到,最大的股东是ASM International NV,拥有25%的流通股。富达国际有限公司是第二大股东,持有12%的普通股,施罗德投资管理(新加坡)有限公司持有公司约4.4%的股份。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前7名股东占股东名册的一半以上,少数小股东在一定程度上平衡了大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of ASM Pacific Technology

ASM太平洋技术公司的内部人士所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our information suggests that ASM Pacific Technology Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around HK$29m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息显示,ASM太平洋科技有限公司的内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。它是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员有可能在该公司拥有有意义的权益,而不是拥有太多按比例分配的权益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约2900万港元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股票是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司28%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 25% of the ASM Pacific Technology shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我们可以看到,上市公司持有ASM太平洋科技已发行股票的25%。很难说肯定,但这表明他们的商业利益交织在一起。这可能是一个战略利害关系,因此值得关注这一所有权变化的空间。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with ASM Pacific Technology (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑一下无处不在的投资风险幽灵。我们已经确定了两个警告信号与ASM太平洋技术公司(至少1个,这是有点不愉快),并了解他们应该是你投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费分析师对该公司的预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发