share_log

How Much Of Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) Do Insiders Own?

How Much Of Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) Do Insiders Own?

内部人士持有莱佛士医疗集团有限公司(SGX:BSL)多少股份?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/31 19:51

A look at the shareholders of Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) can tell us which group is most powerful. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

看看莱佛士医疗集团有限公司(SGX:BSL)的股东就能知道哪个集团最强大。机构通常会持有较大公司的股票,我们预计内部人士将持有较小公司相当比例的股份。我通常喜欢看到一定程度的内部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如纳西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所说,不要告诉我你的想法,告诉我你的投资组合中有什么。

Raffles Medical Group isn't enormous, but it's not particularly small either. It has a market capitalization of S$2.2b, which means it would generally expect to see some institutions on the share registry. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Raffles Medical Group.

莱佛士医疗集团并不庞大,但也不是特别小。它的市值为22亿新元,这意味着它通常预计会有一些机构出现在股票登记簿上。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构拥有该公司的股份。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于莱佛士医疗集团的信息。

See our latest analysis for Raffles Medical Group

查看我们对莱佛士医疗集团的最新分析

SGX:BSL Ownership Breakdown May 31st 2022
新交所:BSL所有权明细2022年5月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raffles Medical Group?

关于莱佛士医疗集团,机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

We can see that Raffles Medical Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Raffles Medical Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,莱佛士医疗集团确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多家机构持有一只股票时,它们总是面临“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司,这一风险更高。你可以在下面看到莱佛士医疗集团的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事中总是有更多的东西。

SGX:BSL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 31st 2022
新交所:BSL收益和收入增长2022年5月31日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Raffles Medical Group. Raffles Medical Holdings Pte. Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 39% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 8.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Choon Yong Loo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对莱佛士医疗集团进行有意义的投资。莱佛士医疗控股有限公司。株式会社目前是最大股东,持有39%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有11%和8.0%的流通股。作为第二大股东的春永路也恰好持有首席执行官的头衔。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现,前3名股东合计控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有相当大的权力来影响公司的决策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司的机构持股可以增加你的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解一只股票的预期表现也是一个很好的做法。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Raffles Medical Group

莱佛士医疗集团的内部人所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Raffles Medical Group Ltd. It has a market capitalization of just S$2.2b, and insiders have S$278m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息显示,内部人士持有莱佛士医疗集团有限公司的大量股份。该集团的市值仅为22亿新元,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值2.78亿新元的股票。这是非常重要的。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Raffles Medical Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有24%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对莱佛士医疗集团有一定程度的影响力。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 42%, of the Raffles Medical Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎拥有莱佛士医疗集团42%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有一家私人公司来对上市公司感兴趣,而不是以个人身份。虽然很难得出任何大致的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个值得进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我总是喜欢找一个收入增长的历史。你也可以,通过访问这张免费的历史收入和收益图表详细图表.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发