share_log

What You Need To Know About Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd.'s (HKG:2098) Investor Composition

What You Need To Know About Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd.'s (HKG:2098) Investor Composition

您需要了解卓尔智能商务集团有限公司(HKG:2098)的投资者构成
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/23 21:15

A look at the shareholders of Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd. (HKG:2098) can tell us which group is most powerful. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

看看卓尔智能商务集团有限公司(HKG:2098)的股东就能知道哪个集团最强大。大公司通常有机构作为股东,我们通常会看到内部人士持有小公司的股份。我通常喜欢看到一定程度的内部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如纳西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所说,不要告诉我你的想法,告诉我你的投资组合中有什么。

Zall Smart Commerce Group is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of HK$6.2b, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions don't own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Zall Smart Commerce Group.

按照全球标准,卓尔智能商务集团并不是一家大公司。它的市值为62亿港元,这意味着它不会受到许多机构投资者的关注。我们对该公司所有权的分析显示,机构并不持有该公司的股份。我们可以放大不同的所有权组,了解有关卓尔智能商务集团的更多信息。

View our latest analysis for Zall Smart Commerce Group

查看我们对卓尔智能商务集团的最新分析

SEHK:2098 Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2022
联交所:2098年所有权分类2022年5月24日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zall Smart Commerce Group?

关于卓尔智能商务集团,缺乏机构所有权告诉了我们什么?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司往往缺乏机构投资者,但大公司没有机构投资者的情况较少。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Zall Smart Commerce Group, for yourself, below.

为什么没有机构持有一家公司的股票,可能有各种原因。通常情况下,新上市的小型公司不会引起基金经理太多关注,因为大型基金管理公司不可能在该公司建立有意义的头寸。基金经理也有可能不持有这只股票,因为他们不相信它会表现良好。机构投资者可能不会觉得这项业务的历史性增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以在下面看到卓尔智能商务集团过去的收入表现。

SEHK:2098 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2022
联交所:2098年盈利及收入增长2022年5月24日

Zall Smart Commerce Group is not owned by hedge funds. With a 65% stake, CEO Zhi Yan is the largest shareholder. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 0.9% and 0.08% of the stock. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

卓尔智能商务集团并不为对冲基金所有。CEO智彦持有65%的股份,是最大股东。拥有如此庞大的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来有很大的控制权。当内部人持有公司大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好兆头,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人士有这样的皮肤。相比之下,第二大股东和第三大股东分别持有约0.9%和0.08%的股份。有趣的是,第二大股东和第三大股东恰好也分别是最高管理层和董事会成员。这再次表明该公司的大股东拥有相当大的内部人所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。我们的信息显示,分析师没有对该股进行任何报道,因此它可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Zall Smart Commerce Group

卓尔智能商务集团的内部人士所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Zall Smart Commerce Group Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of HK$6.2b, that means they have HK$4.1b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

看来,内部人士持有卓尔智能商务集团有限公司一半以上的股票。这给了他们很大的权力。鉴于该公司的市值为62亿港元,这意味着他们拥有价值41亿港元的股票。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望发现(免费)如果他们一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司34%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Zall Smart Commerce Group has 3 warning signs (and 2 which make us uncomfortable) we think you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例-卓尔智能商务集团3个警示标志(和2个让我们不舒服的)我们认为你应该知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我们的免费一组有趣的潜在客户,拥有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发