share_log

What Kind Of Shareholders Own City Developments Limited (SGX:C09)?

What Kind Of Shareholders Own City Developments Limited (SGX:C09)?

哪种股东拥有城市发展有限公司(SGX:C09)?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/23 20:50

The big shareholder groups in City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.

城市发展有限公司(SGX:C09)的大股东集团对该公司拥有控制权。机构通常持有较成熟公司的股票,而内部人士拥有相当一部分较小公司的情况并不少见。我们还倾向于看到,以前为公众所有的公司的内部人持股比例较低。

With a market capitalization of S$7.3b, City Developments is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about City Developments.

City Developments的市值为73亿新元,规模相当大。我们预计会在登记簿上看到机构投资者。这种规模的公司通常也为散户投资者所熟知。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。我们可以放大不同的所有权群体,了解更多关于城市发展的信息。

View our latest analysis for City Developments

查看我们对城市发展的最新分析

SGX:C09 Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2022
新交所:C09所有权明细2022年5月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About City Developments?

关于城市发展,机构所有制告诉了我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构以一个接近当地市场的指数来衡量它们的表现。因此,他们通常更关注那些被纳入主要指数的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in City Developments. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at City Developments' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在City Developments拥有相当多的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得关注的是City Developments以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

SGX:C09 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2022
新交所:C09收益和收入增长2022年5月24日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in City Developments. The company's largest shareholder is Hong Leong Investment Holdings Pte. Ltd., with ownership of 50%. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. The second and third largest shareholders are BlackRock, Inc. and Euroform (S) Pte. Limited, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 2.2%.

我们注意到,对冲基金在City Developments没有有意义的投资。该公司的最大股东是宏亮投资控股有限公司。有限公司,持股50%。这本质上意味着他们对公司的未来有广泛的影响,如果不是完全控制的话。第二和第三大股东是贝莱德公司和Euroform(S)Pte。有限,持股比例相同,持股比例为2.2%。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师追踪该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of City Developments

城市发展的内部人所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of City Developments Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around S$3.5m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士持有City Development Limited不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过一种我们没有注意到的公司结构拥有间接利益。它是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员有可能在该公司拥有有意义的权益,而不是拥有太多按比例分配的权益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约350万新元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样重要。你可以点击这里,看看内部人士是在买入还是卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over City Developments. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有34%业权的公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对城市发展项目有一定程度的影响力。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有该公司54%的股份。仅从这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查一下谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司拥有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for City Developments (1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.

我发现看看到底是谁拥有一家公司是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经确定城市发展的2个警示标志(1是关于的)你应该知道的。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发