share_log

Why China Ludao Technology's (HKG:2023) Soft Earnings Are Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

Why China Ludao Technology's (HKG:2023) Soft Earnings Are Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

为什么中国绿道科技(HKG:2023)的疲软收益只是其问题的开始
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/09 18:42

China Ludao Technology Company Limited (HKG:2023) recently posted soft earnings but shareholders didn't react strongly. Our analysis suggests that they may be missing some concerning details underlying the profit numbers.

中国绿道科技股份有限公司(HKG:2023)最近公布了疲软的收益,但股东的反应并不强烈。我们的分析表明,他们可能遗漏了一些与利润数字相关的细节。

Check out our latest analysis for China Ludao Technology

查看我们对中国绿道科技的最新分析

SEHK:2023 Earnings and Revenue History May 9th 2022
联交所:2023年盈利及收入历史2022年5月9日

A Closer Look At China Ludao Technology's Earnings

仔细看看中国陆道科技的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高端金融领域,衡量一家公司将报告利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的程度的关键比率是应计比率(来自现金流)。应计制比率从给定期间的利润中减去FCF,然后将结果除以该时间段内公司的平均运营资产。这个比率告诉我们,一家公司的利润中有多少不是由自由现金流支持的。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

这意味着负的应计比率是一件好事,因为它表明该公司带来的自由现金流比其利润所暗示的要多。虽然应计比率高于零并不令人担忧,但我们确实认为,当一家公司的应计比率相对较高时,这一点值得注意。引用勒维伦和雷苏泰克2014年的一篇论文,“应计利润较高的公司未来的利润往往较低”。

China Ludao Technology has an accrual ratio of 0.27 for the year to December 2021. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥35.5m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥132m in the last year. We also note that China Ludao Technology's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of CN¥132m. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

在截至2021年12月的一年中,中国绿道科技的应计比率为0.27。不幸的是,这意味着其自由现金流远远低于其公布的利润。尽管该公司报告利润为3550万加元,但看看自由现金流就会发现,该公司去年实际上烧掉了1.32亿加元。我们还注意到,中国绿道科技去年的自由现金流实际上也是负的,因此我们可以理解股东是否对其流出的1.32亿元人民币感到困扰。话虽如此,故事中还有更多的东西。应计比率反映了不寻常项目对法定利润的影响,至少在一定程度上是这样。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of China Ludao Technology.

注:我们总是建议投资者检查资产负债表的实力。点击此处查看我们对中国绿道科技的资产负债表分析。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

异常项目对利润的影响

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥29m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. China Ludao Technology had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to December 2021. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

该公司去年有一些不寻常的项目使利润增加了2900万加元,这一事实可能在某种程度上解释了为什么它的应计比率如此之低。虽然我们喜欢看到利润增加,但当不寻常的项目做出了很大贡献时,我们往往会更加谨慎。当我们分析了数千家上市公司的数据时,我们发现,在给定的一年中,不寻常的项目往往会带来提振第二年又重复了一遍。毕竟,这正是会计术语所暗示的。与截至2021年12月的利润相比,中国鲁道科技的异常项目做出了相当大的贡献。因此,我们可以推测,这些不寻常的项目使其法定利润比其他情况下要强劲得多。

Our Take On China Ludao Technology's Profit Performance

我们对中国绿道科技盈利表现的看法

China Ludao Technology had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. Considering all this we'd argue China Ludao Technology's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for China Ludao Technology (2 are concerning!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

中国绿道科技的应计比率较低,但它的利润确实得到了不寻常项目的提振。考虑到这一切,我们认为中国绿道科技的利润可能给人一种过于慷慨的印象,表明其可持续的盈利水平。考虑到这一点,除非我们对风险有透彻的了解,否则我们不会考虑投资股票。当我们做研究时,我们发现中国绿道科技的3个警示信号(2个是关于!)我们认为这值得你的全力关注。

Our examination of China Ludao Technology has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

我们对中国绿道科技的审查集中在某些因素上,这些因素可以让它的收益看起来比实际情况更好。在此基础上,我们对此持怀疑态度。但还有很多其他方式可以让你了解一家公司的看法。一些人认为,高股本回报率是高质量企业的良好标志。虽然这可能需要为您做一些研究,但您可能会发现免费拥有高股本回报率的公司的集合,或者是内部人士购买的有用的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发