share_log

Here's What China Railway Group Limited's (SHSE:601390) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like

Here's What China Railway Group Limited's (SHSE:601390) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like

以下是中国铁路集团有限公司(上交所:601390)的股东股权结构
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/06 19:26

The big shareholder groups in China Railway Group Limited (SHSE:601390) have power over the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

中国铁路集团有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:601390)的大股东集团对该公司拥有控制权。内部人士通常持有大量较年轻、规模较小的公司,而大公司往往有机构作为股东。已经私有化的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股。

With a market capitalization of CN¥160b, China Railway Group is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Railway Group.

中国中铁集团市值1600亿元,规模相当大。我们预计会在登记簿上看到机构投资者。这种规模的公司通常也为散户投资者所熟知。看看我们关于所有权组的数据(如下所示),似乎可以在股票登记处注意到机构。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于中国中铁集团的什么。

View our latest analysis for China Railway Group

查看我们对中铁集团的最新分析

SHSE:601390 Ownership Breakdown May 6th 2022
上海证交所:601390所有权明细2022年5月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Railway Group?

关于中国中铁集团,机构持股告诉了我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时,以基准来衡量自己,因此一旦一只股票被纳入主要指数,它们往往会对这只股票变得更加热情。我们预计,大多数公司都会有一些机构登记在册,特别是在它们正在增长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Railway Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of China Railway Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者在中国中铁集团持有相当数量的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看中国中铁集团过去的盈利轨迹(见下图)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

SHSE:601390 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 6th 2022
上海证交所:601390收益和收入增长2022年5月6日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Railway Group. China Railway Engineering Group Company Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 47% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.5% and 1.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们注意到,对冲基金在中国中铁集团没有有意义的投资。中国铁路工程集团有限公司是目前的最大股东,持有47%的流通股。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有2.5%和1.6%的流通股。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.

对股东登记的更详细的研究表明,三大股东通过他们51%的股份在公司中拥有相当大的所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有相当数量的分析师追踪该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能是有用的。

Insider Ownership Of China Railway Group

中国中铁集团的内部人持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们的数据不能证实董事会成员是个人持股。董事会成员至少没有一些个人持股是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。下一步很好的做法是检查CEO的薪酬。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over China Railway Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有33%股权的公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对中国中铁集团有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 49%, of the China Railway Group stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看起来民营企业持有中国中铁集团49%的股份。或许有必要对此进行更深入的研究。如果关联方,如内部人士,对这些私营公司中的一家有利害关系,则应在年报中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司拥有战略利益。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for China Railway Group (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。比如风险。每家公司都有,我们发现了中国中铁集团的两个警示标志(其中一个是重要的!)你应该知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终未来是最重要的。您可以访问此免费分析师对该公司的预测报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发