share_log

Brilliance Technology's (SZSE:300542) Sluggish Earnings Might Be Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

Brilliance Technology's (SZSE:300542) Sluggish Earnings Might Be Just The Beginning Of Its Problems

华晨科技(SZSE:300542)收益低迷可能只是其问题的开始
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/05 19:42

Brilliance Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300542) stock showed strength after its weak earnings report. While shareholders may be willing to overlook soft profit numbers, we believe that they should also be taking into account some other factors which may be cause for concern.

华晨科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300542)在疲弱的收益报告后,股票表现强劲。虽然股东可能愿意忽视疲软的利润数字,但我们认为,他们也应该考虑到其他一些可能令人担忧的因素。

Check out our latest analysis for Brilliance Technology

查看我们对华晨科技的最新分析

SZSE:300542 Earnings and Revenue History May 5th 2022
深交所:300542财报及营收历史2022年5月5日

A Closer Look At Brilliance Technology's Earnings

仔细看看华晨科技的收益

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

衡量一家公司将利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的程度的一个关键财务比率是应计比率。为了得到应计比率,我们首先从一个时期的利润中减去FCF,然后用这个数字除以该时期的平均运营资产。你可以把来自现金流的应计比率看作是‘非FCF利润率’。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,负的应计比率对公司是积极的,而正的应计比率是负的。这并不意味着我们应该担心应计比率为正,但值得注意的是,在应计比率相当高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些学术证据表明,一般来说,高应计比率对短期利润来说不是一个好兆头。

For the year to March 2022, Brilliance Technology had an accrual ratio of 0.26. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥65.4m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥75m in the last year. It's worth noting that Brilliance Technology generated positive FCF of CN¥169m a year ago, so at least they've done it in the past. The good news for shareholders is that Brilliance Technology's accrual ratio was much better last year, so this year's poor reading might simply be a case of a short term mismatch between profit and FCF. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.

在截至2022年3月的一年中,华晨科技的应计比率为0.26。不幸的是,这意味着其自由现金流远远低于其公布的利润。尽管该公司报告利润为6540万加元,但看看自由现金流就会发现,该公司去年实际上烧掉了7500万加元。值得注意的是,华晨科技一年前产生了1.69亿元的正FCF,所以至少他们过去做到了。对股东来说,好消息是,华晨科技去年的应计比率要好得多,因此今年的糟糕读数可能只是利润和FCF短期错配的一个例子。如果情况确实如此,股东应该期待本年度相对于利润的现金流有所改善。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Brilliance Technology.

注:我们总是建议投资者检查资产负债表的实力。点击此处查看我们对华晨科技的资产负债表分析。

Our Take On Brilliance Technology's Profit Performance

我们对华晨科技盈利表现的看法

Brilliance Technology's accrual ratio for the last twelve months signifies cash conversion is less than ideal, which is a negative when it comes to our view of its earnings. Therefore, it seems possible to us that Brilliance Technology's true underlying earnings power is actually less than its statutory profit. But at least holders can take some solace from the 64% per annum growth in EPS for the last three. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. If you want to do dive deeper into Brilliance Technology, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. Our analysis shows 3 warning signs for Brilliance Technology (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) and we strongly recommend you look at them before investing.

华晨科技过去12个月的应计比率意味着现金转换不太理想,这对我们对其收益的看法是负面的。因此,在我们看来,华晨科技的真实潜在盈利能力实际上低于其法定利润是可能的。但至少持有者可以从过去三年每股收益64%的年增长率中得到一些安慰。本文的目的是评估我们可以在多大程度上依赖法定收益来反映公司的潜力,但还有很多东西需要考虑。如果你真的想更深入地研究华晨科技,你还应该调查一下它目前面临的风险。我们的分析显示了华晨科技的3个警告信号(1个不太受我们欢迎!)我们强烈建议你在投资之前先看看它们。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Brilliance Technology's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

这份报告只关注了一个因素,它揭示了华晨科技的利润本质。但还有很多其他方式可以让你了解一家公司的看法。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是有利的商业经济指标,而另一些人则喜欢“跟着钱走”,寻找内部人士正在买入的股票。虽然这可能需要为您做一些研究,但您可能会发现免费拥有高股本回报率的公司的集合,或者是内部人士购买的有用的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
这篇由《华尔街日报》撰写的文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简单地说,华尔街在提到的任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发