share_log

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited's (HKG:3709) Shares?

What Kind Of Shareholders Hold The Majority In EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited's (HKG:3709) Shares?

什么类型的股东持有EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited(HKG:3709)的多数股权?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/05/01 20:31

Every investor in EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited (HKG:3709) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited(HKG:3709)的每一位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。机构通常持有较成熟公司的股票,而内部人士拥有相当一部分较小公司的情况并不少见。沃伦·巴菲特说,他喜欢“一家由有能力、以所有者为导向的人经营的、具有持久竞争优势的企业”。因此,看到一些内部人持股是件好事,因为这可能表明管理层是以所有者为导向的。

With a market capitalization of HK$8.7b, EEKA Fashion Holdings is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are not really that prevalent on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about EEKA Fashion Holdings.

市值87亿港元的EEKA Fashion Holdings是一个相当大的规模,因此很可能在机构投资者的雷达上。看看我们关于所有权组的数据(如下),似乎机构在股票登记处并不是真的那么普遍。我们可以放大不同的所有权集团,了解更多关于EEKA时尚控股公司的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for EEKA Fashion Holdings

查看我们对EEKA时尚控股公司的最新分析

SEHK:3709 Ownership Breakdown May 2nd 2022
联交所:3709所有权分类2022年5月2日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EEKA Fashion Holdings?

缺乏机构所有权告诉了我们关于EEKA时尚控股公司的什么?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构投资者往往会避开那些规模太小、流动性太差或风险太高的公司,这些公司对他们的口味来说太小了。但在没有任何机构投资者的情况下,看到较大的公司并不常见。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. EEKA Fashion Holdings might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

为什么没有机构持有一家公司的股票,可能有各种原因。通常情况下,新上市的小型公司不会引起基金经理太多关注,因为大型基金管理公司不可能在该公司建立有意义的头寸。或者,该公司可能有某些方面让机构投资者望而却步。Eeeka Fashion Holdings可能没有机构想要的那种过去的表现,或者他们只是没有仔细研究过这项业务。

SEHK:3709 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 2nd 2022
联交所:3709盈利及收入增长2022年5月2日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in EEKA Fashion Holdings. The company's CEO Ming Jin is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. Rui Jin is the second largest shareholder owning 29% of common stock, and Hongmei He holds about 0.2% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对EEKA Fashion Holdings进行有意义的投资。该公司首席执行官金明是最大股东,持有40%的流通股。瑞金是第二大股东,持有29%的普通股,红梅和持有约0.2%的公司股份。有趣的是,第二大股东和第三大股东恰好也分别是高级关键高管和董事会成员。这再次表明该公司的大股东拥有相当大的内部人所有权。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在进一步挖掘后,我们发现,前两名股东共同控制着公司一半以上的股份,这意味着他们拥有相当大的权力来影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有一些分析师对该股的报道,但随着时间的推移,它仍可能变得更加广为人知。

Insider Ownership Of EEKA Fashion Holdings

EEKA时尚控股的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。公司管理层管理企业,但首席执行官将向董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

内部人持股是积极的,当它标志着领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时。然而,高内部人持股也可以给公司内部的一个小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of EEKA Fashion Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$8.7b, that means insiders have a whopping HK$6.0b worth of shares in their own names. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有EEKA时尚控股有限公司的大部分股份。这意味着他们可以集体为公司做出决定。鉴于其市值为87亿港元,这意味着内部人士以自己的名义持有价值高达60亿港元的股票。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士是否一直在出售他们的股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众持有该公司31%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。虽然这群人不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand EEKA Fashion Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with EEKA Fashion Holdings .

拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但为了更好地理解EEKA Fashion Holdings,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,你应该注意到我们在EEKA时尚控股公司发现的两个警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
这篇由《华尔街日报》撰写的文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简单地说,华尔街在提到的任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发