share_log

Weak Statutory Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Zhejiang Lante Optics (SHSE:688127)

Weak Statutory Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Zhejiang Lante Optics (SHSE:688127)

疲弱的法定收益可能不能说明浙江朗特光学的全部故事(上交所:688127)
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/28 19:37

A lackluster earnings announcement from Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688127) last week didn't sink the stock price. We think that investors are worried about some weaknesses underlying the earnings.

一份平淡无奇的财报浙江朗特光学有限公司。(上海证券交易所:688127)上周的股价并没有下跌。我们认为,投资者担心的是盈利背后的一些弱点。

See our latest analysis for Zhejiang Lante Optics

查看我们对浙江蓝特光学的最新分析

SHSE:688127 Earnings and Revenue History April 28th 2022
上海证交所:688127收益和收入历史2022年4月28日

Zooming In On Zhejiang Lante Optics' Earnings

放大浙江兰特光学公司的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高端金融领域,衡量一家公司将报告利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的程度的关键比率是应计比率(来自现金流)。为了得到应计比率,我们首先从一个时期的利润中减去FCF,然后用这个数字除以该时期的平均运营资产。这个比率告诉我们,一家公司的利润中有多少不是由自由现金流支持的。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,负的应计比率对公司是积极的,而正的应计比率是负的。虽然应计比率高于零并不令人担忧,但我们确实认为,当一家公司的应计比率相对较高时,这一点值得注意。引用勒维伦和雷苏泰克2014年的一篇论文,“应计利润较高的公司未来的利润往往较低”。

For the year to March 2022, Zhejiang Lante Optics had an accrual ratio of 0.22. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow fell significantly short of its reported profits. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥123.2m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥16m in the last year. We saw that FCF was CN¥164m a year ago though, so Zhejiang Lante Optics has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

在截至2022年3月的一年中,浙江蓝特光学的应计比率为0.22。不幸的是,这意味着其自由现金流远远低于其公布的利润。尽管它报告了1.232亿加元的利润,但看看自由现金流就会发现,它在去年实际上烧掉了1600万加元。我们看到一年前的FCF是1.64亿元人民币,所以浙江朗特光学至少在过去能够产生正的FCF。然而,这并不是需要考虑的全部问题。我们可以看到,不寻常的项目影响了其法定利润,从而影响了应计比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道,分析师对未来盈利能力的预测是什么。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于他们估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不寻常的项目如何影响利润?

The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥15m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. Assuming those unusual items don't show up again in the current year, we'd thus expect profit to be weaker next year (in the absence of business growth, that is).

该公司去年有一些不寻常的项目使利润增加了1500万加元,这一事实可能在某种程度上解释了为什么它的应计比率如此之低。虽然我们喜欢看到利润增加,但当不寻常的项目做出了很大贡献时,我们往往会更加谨慎。当我们分析全球绝大多数上市公司时,我们发现重大的不寻常项目往往不会重复。考虑到这些提振被描述为“不寻常的”,这正如你所预期的那样。假设这些不同寻常的项目在本年度不会再次出现,我们因此预计明年的利润会更弱(也就是说,在没有业务增长的情况下)。

Our Take On Zhejiang Lante Optics' Profit Performance

我们对浙江朗特光学公司盈利表现的看法

Summing up, Zhejiang Lante Optics received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. Considering all this we'd argue Zhejiang Lante Optics' profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for Zhejiang Lante Optics (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

综上所述,浙江蓝特光学从异常项目中获利获得不错的提振,但无法将账面利润与自由现金流相匹配。考虑到这一切,我们认为浙江蓝特光学的利润可能给人一种过于慷慨的印象,表明其可持续的盈利水平。考虑到这一点,除非我们对风险有透彻的了解,否则我们不会考虑投资股票。当我们做研究时,我们发现了浙江蓝天光学的3个警告标志(1个有点不舒服!)我们认为这值得你的全力关注。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

在这篇文章中,我们研究了一些可能削弱利润数字效用的因素,我们对此持谨慎态度。但还有很多其他方式可以让你了解一家公司的看法。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是有利的商业经济指标,而另一些人则喜欢“跟着钱走”,寻找内部人士正在买入的股票。虽然这可能需要为您做一些研究,但您可能会发现免费拥有高股本回报率的公司的集合,或者是内部人士购买的有用的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
这篇由《华尔街日报》撰写的文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简单地说,华尔街在提到的任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发