share_log

Could The Ocumension Therapeutics (HKG:1477) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Could The Ocumension Therapeutics (HKG:1477) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful?

Ocumension Treeutics(HKG:1477)的所有权结构能告诉我们一些有用的东西吗?
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/27 19:21

Every investor in Ocumension Therapeutics (HKG:1477) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Ocumension Treateutics(HKG:1477)的每一位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。内部人士通常持有大量较年轻、规模较小的公司,而大公司往往有机构作为股东。沃伦·巴菲特说,他喜欢“一家由有能力、以所有者为导向的人经营的、具有持久竞争优势的企业”。因此,看到一些内部人持股是件好事,因为这可能表明管理层是以所有者为导向的。

Ocumension Therapeutics has a market capitalization of HK$6.5b, so we would expect some institutional investors to have noticed the stock. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Ocumension Therapeutics.

Ocumension Treeutics的市值为65亿港元,因此我们预计一些机构投资者已经注意到了这只股票。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。我们可以放大不同的所有权集团,以了解更多关于Ocumension Treeutics的信息。

See our latest analysis for Ocumension Therapeutics

查看我们对Ocumension Treeutics的最新分析

SEHK:1477 Ownership Breakdown April 27th 2022
联交所:1477所有权分类2022年4月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ocumension Therapeutics?

机构所有权告诉了我们什么关于占领治疗的信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。

We can see that Ocumension Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ocumension Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,Ocumension Treeutics确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售一只股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看Ocumension Treateutics过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

SEHK:1477 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 27th 2022
联交所:1477盈利及收入增长2022年4月27日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ocumension Therapeutics. Our data shows that 6 Dimensions Capital, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 12% of the stock. In addition, we found that Ye Liu, the CEO has 2.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

对冲基金在Ocumension Treateutics的股份并不多。我们的数据显示,6Dimensions Capital,L.P.是最大的股东,持有25%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东分别持有约13%和12%的股份。此外,我们发现,叶刘的CEO有2.1%的股份分配给了他们的名字。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 59% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即公司约59%的股份由前4名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向也是有意义的。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ocumension Therapeutics

Ocumension治疗公司的内部人所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人的定义可能是主观的,而且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个别内部人士,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情况下,这会让其他股东更难让董事会对决策负责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Ocumension Therapeutics. Insiders have a HK$1.0b stake in this HK$6.5b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Ocumension Treateutics的合理比例。在这笔65亿港元的交易中,内部人士持有10亿港元的股份。看到内部人士如此投资于这项业务,真是太好了。或许值得一查的是,这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Ocumension Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众通常是个人投资者,他们持有Ocumension Treeutics 26%的股份。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With a stake of 45%, private equity firms could influence the Ocumension Therapeutics board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司持有45%的股份,可能会影响Ocumension治疗公司的董事会。一些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私人股本有时是让管理层承担责任的积极分子。但在其他时候,私募股权公司让公司上市后,它们的股票都卖光了。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ocumension Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Ocumension Therapeutics is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但为了更好地理解Ocumension治疗,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,我们的投资分析中显示了两个警告信号,您应该知道...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终这就是未来,而不是过去,这将决定这家企业的所有者将做得多好。因此,我们认为,看看这份免费报告是明智的,它显示了分析师是否预测到了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
这篇由《华尔街日报》撰写的文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简单地说,华尔街在提到的任何股票中都没有头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发