Trytosaveabit : I’m not sure what the circumstances are in this particular situation? But maybe the warrants were “ Price Protection Warrants “?  Benefits the warrant holder but dilutes existing common shareholders because yes it causes dilution! Only a guess until I look at the warrants! But that would make sense to me.

doctorpot1 : i think you are referring to this news? https://www.bakersfield.com/ap/news/amprius-announces-temporary-offer-allowing-public-and-private-warrants-to-be-exercised-at-a-reduced/article_5ef45dd2-4274-55d2-bb6c-129e65ff347f.html

doctorpot1 : looks like they need cash and is using the warrant to raise cash instead. they need to give a discount so as to incentive the warrant holder to exercise and buy the shares.

103241763 : is it a good idea?AMPX has huge insiders ownership im scared.can u elaborate on that

MonkeyGeeOP 103241763: huge inside ownership gives it more control and also prevents takeovers.  in addition, if the stock drops or gains, the insider would feel it.  There are pros and cons to everything.   There is absolutely risky.  But so was Tesla just before it pop.

103241763 MonkeyGeeOP: should I pump ampx now?it was down 10% today but im totally unsure about earning day and day after that hahahaha

103241763 MonkeyGeeOP: i see,was tesla on significant inside ownerships too?

MonkeyGeeOP 103241763: Obviously tesla was in a different ball game.  You know that tesla was almost in bankruptcy just before it took off.  This company is nowhere as solid as tesla.