Advertisement
Singapore markets close in 1 hour 59 minutes
  • Straits Times Index

    3,298.41
    +7.71 (+0.23%)
     
  • Nikkei

    38,179.46
    -49.65 (-0.13%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    19,092.77
    +129.09 (+0.68%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +261.61 (+3.20%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    61,434.03
    +495.40 (+0.81%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,265.41
    +5.21 (+0.41%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,222.68
    +94.89 (+1.85%)
     
  • Dow

    39,512.84
    +837.14 (+2.16%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    16,340.87
    +184.57 (+1.14%)
     
  • Gold

    2,354.70
    -20.30 (-0.85%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    78.20
    -0.06 (-0.08%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.5040
    +0.0040 (+0.09%)
     
  • FTSE Bursa Malaysia

    1,602.72
    +2.05 (+0.13%)
     
  • Jakarta Composite Index

    7,102.22
    +13.43 (+0.19%)
     
  • PSE Index

    6,592.10
    +80.17 (+1.23%)
     

What You Need To Know About Direct Selling Acquisition Corp.'s (NYSE:DSAQ) Investor Composition

The big shareholder groups in Direct Selling Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:DSAQ) have power over the company. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. Warren Buffett said that he likes "a business with enduring competitive advantages that is run by able and owner-oriented people." So it's nice to see some insider ownership, because it may suggest that management is owner-oriented.

Direct Selling Acquisition is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$288m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Direct Selling Acquisition.

View our latest analysis for Direct Selling Acquisition

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Direct Selling Acquisition?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

ADVERTISEMENT

We can see that Direct Selling Acquisition does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Direct Selling Acquisition, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.7% of Direct Selling Acquisition. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 21% stake, CEO David Wentz is the largest shareholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.9% and 4.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

Insider Ownership Of Direct Selling Acquisition

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Direct Selling Acquisition Corp.. Insiders have a US$58m stake in this US$288m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Direct Selling Acquisition. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Direct Selling Acquisition (at least 2 which are a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.